1HWork
Tjark reads his deportation notice and can't believe it. He has been working unregistered for a temporary employment agency for a few months now and keeps himself afloat by providing support services in various care facilities. Mirko his boss was happy with him. He earned 370 euros this week. It looked so good! Now it says he has to go back to Afghanistan. His flight costs the state about twice as much.
Hanno the Uber driver is sleeping in his car. He's just doing this so he doesn't get fired. Because if he doesn't respond immediately to his algorithm-controlled service app, there will be trouble with the boss. So he has set an alarm that lets him start up reliably every time the city and the company think they can use his driving talent again.
Selma Ennaifer, the Tunisian Foreign Minister, speaks to representatives of the European Commission in an almost pleading tone. The reason? The EU's travel restrictions due to the pandemic mean that 70 percent (!) of the businesses in Tunisia, a tourist destination, have to close.
Three very different stories and yet similarly symbolic of the misery we are in. The examples have the theme of work and failure in common. In particular, it becomes clear which serious systemic errors are built into the current globally oriented work organization.
Growing up relatively sheltered, I experienced gainful employment as a strange attempt at oppression. Starting with enveloping for a clothing company, through jobs in call centers and finally at the ORF, I learned early on to lack freedom. Since life is not a jump-and-run game where you have 3 lives, I started my own personal liberation movement after my studies and became self-employed in the creative field. I have reorganized education, training and work for myself and have since spent a considerable amount of time initiating projects that deal with finding out how we as a society could escape from the captivity of the job system.
Utopia for Realists
With digitalization, workplaces cease to be fixed places and begin to transform into states. In this article I want to get you to think about these conditions together with New Work-New Culture. We could philosophize, dream, and ponder for 10 minutes about how we can ensure, in the rapidly accelerating transformation process of work, that we achieve something better in the end.
A key to this is Bergmann's concept of “really, really wanting”. The New Work “WWW” has little or nothing to do with self-realization and self-optimization. According to Bergmann, New Work is not about a little improvement, not about job crafting. New Work – New culture doesn't just touch the surface and esotericism is a horror for us. NANK is an evolutionary, philosophical concept of freedom with a focus on work.
Work goes deep into the understanding of personality and the values and core beliefs associated with it. It also comprehensively defines and dominates relationship values in the world. New Work, as Frithjof Bergmann sees it, has nothing to do with love bombing, shining in the sun or the value of being used in itself. It is much more about the intrinsic motivation of what is present within oneself and how strongly it is perceived. In comparison to the power of external influences, people's own desires do not pull with strong ropes, but hang on a thin and easily torn, delicate thread. New Work calls this phenomenon the “poverty of desire”. The human being itself is far too often, first and foremost, weak and fragile. People quickly become discouraged, depressed and tame. Therefore, it is easy to intimidate or even train people, and many people are shy and withdrawn. Frithjof Bergmann also calls the phenomenon self-ignorance; beyond the individual, he speaks of the “concept of unlived life,” which often shapes working society. Handle
In the first part of this article, which can be read in about 7 minutes, I would like to outline Bergmann's New Work in more detail and embed it in the current socio-political context. It will be an attempt to position the essential elements, calling and community production, within the changing economic framework. The second part is about what role digitalization plays in the transformation process of work, what is going wrong and how we could transfer this into a new, more humane era. I refer to the current developments surrounding COVID and the long-term major forces of democratization, automation, globalization and monetary control. In the last part, I present our current approach to how a technological tool could be used to specifically improve the situation on the labor market. "Ø – The value of an hour of work" attempts to develop a value system for work secured using DLT (Blockchain) technology. Ø is an index that uses artificial intelligence to learn how to correct incorrect dispositions and unequal evaluations of work and systemic errors in salary issues. From data already collected, supplemented with new evaluation approaches, a factor is calculated by which an existing remuneration should be multiplied in order to better reflect the social value of a job. So that as little ideology as possible sets the tone, we try to capture the activities themselves with a matrix of skillsets.
Both soft factors such as creativity and empathy as well as hard criteria such as the level of education required for this activity or the average work speed are taken into account.
work is the change machine
I
In the part-time review that we call work, we slowly come to the realization that we as a society are somehow stuck when it comes to work. Economic growth madness, automation. Digitalization. It doesn't go forward or back. According to Bergmann, New Work has been thinking about why this is and how we could change it for 40 years and is proposing something new. New Work-New Culture firmly believes that with smart changes to the work system we can have a positive impact on the whole world. Calling – the intrinsic calling – linked to collaborative production methods will revolutionize working life and the way we live. Technologically, the unimaginable is already possible. As a private person, you can dock your phone to the AI "GPT-3" and have a universe of possibilities that goes beyond your imagination and initially flattens you in its abundance. For example, you can have fictitious conversations with Thunberg, Chomsky, Musk, Obama, the Pope or the Chinese civil rights activist Wei Jingsheng. For example, if you ask what is going wrong with digitalization and what the next right step would be, artificial intelligence provides the answer from the data of the published statements of these thinkers that it is up to us whether it turns out badly or well. But there are also amazingly more useful, logical and authentic-sounding answers to the really pressing questions of our time. Even scientists who work on it are left with a feeling somewhere between euphoria and bewilderment when they propose solutions to the climate problem. In some cases, these experts can no longer even understand exactly how AI comes up with its solutions when it invents new things in goods logistics, resource conservation and smart health robotics. Theoretically, everyone with the Internet has swarm intelligence in their pocket as a tool for making decisions. Theoretically, firstly, access is limited and secondly, this oracle is the machine learning substrate of “everyone’s opinion”. The question is not just philosophical but quite practical as to whether this really has anything to do with intelligence. This supposedly collectively secured data is available from the perspective of a programmer and an institution that decides on the data composition of the model. To what extent this data is ethically compromised, to what extent it is just mainstream, to what extent it is the devil is currently being researched. What we already know is that they are similar to Wikipedia, white, male and dominated by rich countries.
New Work, with its approach of listening individually to what you need and what you want, helps you navigate uncertainty. When it comes to entering this wide, white and uncharted field of new possibilities, we need a strong inner compass. Because, despite the revolutionary framework, there may still be a marathon ahead of us before we synchronize sufficiently and develop common cultural techniques that raise the potential of what is possible and ultimately enable a better life for many. But what we are already dealing with is an acceleration of transformation processes, which people are sometimes facing with fear. There has always been change, especially at work. But now we see the beginning of a new era. On the one hand, it is the obvious acceleration of upheavals that provides good reasons to speak of a new era. But it is also the nature of the fragility. As Václav Havel once said, it is as if something were exhausting and destroying itself. But what now rises from the rubble? How can we deal with these breaks? New Work – New Culture is interested in the symptoms of decay and departure and the contradictions as an expression of a deeper transformation of work as we know it. When it comes to work and meaning, we still long for something different. It is not yet possible to define this other. But the fog is clearing. A first idea of what the new thing could look like grows as the offspring of a kind of collective longing. What we are seeing now is that a new form of being present and being present is emerging. This presence not only has something to do with digital 5G acceleration, but also something to do with authenticity, with being close to what you do every day.
Industrial Age – Information Age – Augmented Age
From the very beginning – and that was back in the 70s – the New Work did not want to regret the end of the job system, but rather to celebrate it frenetically. As Hegelians, we believe that we are not born free from the beginning, but that the path to freedom is difficult to achieve. And the job system has made people terribly unfree. In the classic wage-earning society, optimizing a company means optimizing “human resources”. People with individual wishes, skills and living conditions are referred to as resources and we want to use them as willing employees as multi-flexibly and effectively as possible. More and more people, and not just since Corona, are no longer playing along. People fall out of their roles, things are no longer in their place. Politicians have looked at continuities for too long and overlooked the radical epochal break around 1980. The topics have changed. An entire intellectual coordinate system has shifted: people, torn between the individual and society, oscillating between the individual psyche and that of the masses, the individual's body bent into the social body. There is also a pull from desire to need, from a vertical to a horizontal order. In this situation, New Work calls for a sustainable strengthening of the individual's free will and a collaborative spirit. Finding out what you want, finding your calling, can help defuse problems when navigating uncertainty if we allow a little more flamboyance for what is “naturally possible”. During the industrial era, the vast majority of work was done using muscle power; it was dull, grueling, exhausting backbreaking work. In the post-industrial age, this work is almost entirely done by machines. The first “Dark Factories” are in Taipei. The production halls there remain dark because in normal operation only robots with sensors and not a single person work. Regardless of the current flight restrictions, Lufthansa has plans in place to manage business in the future with 40,000 fewer employees. It is estimated that artificial intelligence and augmented reality will make 30-50 percent of current jobs obsolete in the next 10 years. Maxim
What will we work on? We don't know for sure. But what we can say is that the work will not stop. In order to overcome the "Great Challenges" – poverty, environment, health – in society, billions of people can and must get involved.
If we let machines do the dull work, two thirds of all work could be employment that makes you stronger, that is tailored to you, that advances you, that serves your self-realization. This represents enormous progress, because in the past only small privileged elites – artists, intellectuals and inventors – could enjoy the hearty lifeblood of such work. A cleverly linked network of collaboration, combined with entrepreneurship and fair remuneration mechanisms, can offer protection against job loss, downward mobility and poverty. The core message: 'Work on what you really, really want!' This important nucleus of freedom joins research and discovery in 'Community Production' and combines work on hi-tech machines with a good touch of entrepreneurial spirit.
The Value of Work
The way in which the current economic reference system has systemically anchored the exchange of goods for the last 150 years has weakened people. They have merely tamed it and not developed it. In addition, this modern, Western materialism only works slowly. Japan has not produced any significant economic growth for decades, although perversely the ongoing costs of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima and the protests over it are, for example, taken into account as 'growth'.
The current understanding of economics is very narrow. Areas such as social care, family and reproductive work are systematically undervalued, and art and culture and the realities of life of marginalized groups are negated. Not least because of this, work is increasingly confronted with an inclusion logic of meaning, intimacy, concern and inclination. Mass production is not focused on creating cultural richness, diversity and inclusion. After 20 years of optimization efficiency, the richness has been consistently slowed down. If society wants to move away from mass production because other needs come to the fore, then we must necessarily ask ourselves: is the organization of work and production that we have the best possible way to unleash creativity and innovation?
money and work
In view of the change in the value and the meaning of the concept of goods itself, New Work is convinced that the value of work can also be completely reassessed. Up to now, money has been more of a lubricant for many things to fail in the end. A real store of value for work could be the lubricant that makes it all work. In order to regain more mining rights to life, we could empower people with a new form of work organization and work evaluation. We could experience a rise instead of an exhaustion of people with the digital and we could move more and more towards a culture of freedom. We just haven't really learned yet how to remelt and reshape our centuries-old collective patterns of thinking, speaking and institutionalization to fit the new realities. In this space of possibilities, in Walter Benjamin's “now time”, New Work-New Culture has arguments, images, terms and tools, where it seems so difficult to develop an emancipatory vision of the future and to look for ways to realize it in the here and now.
The Epic Conversation About the US Dollar System with Macro Analyst Luke Gromen from April 2020
One of the most important macroeconomic questions facing the world is the future of the global reserve system, which has been dominated by the US dollar for the last 80 years.
Using Digitalization for a New Money and Value System
II
Digitalization is one of the big drivers of change in work. But the digital revolution is going wrong. We seem to be losing to the algorithms. Everything is regulated, used and accounted for and what is humane is crushed between the bits and bytes. Inequality continues to rise. The distribution of knowledge and resources as well as the value chains are distributed even more inhomogeneously globally, nationally and locally due to digitalization and the associated automation and production changes.
crime scenes
Change in production is at the same time a change in the value of labor. Work performance and its value have become largely decoupled from fair pay in real stores of value. Given the effects of digitalization, the value creation regime is currently changing. The practices of production and consumption are changing towards open, distributed and feedback forms of production. New forms of collaboration are becoming more relevant and decentralization and fair value exchange are taking shape.
Here too, the magnifying glass of the corona and economic crisis highlights the extent of the distortion and ruthlessly exposes weak points. Where digitalization, communication and synchronization succeed, work works. Mobile office and homeschooling are not an option for precarious professional groups. The 21st century digital economy runs on a 20th century operating system. The big tech companies like Tencent, Facebook, Google, Alibaba, Tesla, Netflix are single-handedly hijacking NASDAQ & Co. during Corona. The platform's feudalism à la Amazon is becoming obvious in its frightening power potential.
Instead of this monopoly and surveillance capitalism, New Work strives for an economic circular system of global neighborhoods with balanced production and use: decentralized, regional collaboration in the form of 'community production' as a kind of basic economy; concrete substrates of freedom in the form of access to infrastructure and commons for people instead of a basic income. Community workshops for this purpose are being set up around the world and are astonishing with their production capacities. The 'Grande Garage' in the Linz tobacco factory is around 4,000 square meters and is equipped with, among other things, high-performance fabricators, laser cutters, computer-controlled milling machines and industrial robots. Researchers, industry and start-ups, but also students, artists and grandfathers are allowed to work, design and make prototypes there.
Leaving the Value of Work to Computers?
III
Digital systems, especially artificial intelligence, are at the beginning of their development history and valid results from technology assessments are only slowly arriving. What has emerged is that there are many ethical questions that need to be negotiated and require democratic consensus, which the legislature then has to take into account. The issue of security and control is also a substantial one. Both regulatory trends and completely free, bottom-up initiatives are emerging here.
We must see the digital as a new form of craft
New Work according to Bergmann, it is important that constitutional and relationship values are the benchmark for the use of technology. The success of relationships is currently being undermined by economics. Alternative work and remuneration models therefore urgently need to be developed. “New Pay” is currently more likely to be reduced to the renewal of compensation models within an organization. But we need a new approach to interdisciplinary compensation. What we are proposing is just a correction factor to the so-called "free labor market" so that the acceptance of such re-evaluated work performance among the traditional stakeholders in wage issues – the business people and trade unions – increases.
Ø – An AI- and Blockchain-Supported Index for the Value of Work
The index Ø attempts to reduce misallocations in existing calculation approaches for wages by taking correction parameters into account. Here is a rough overview: The index learns from: – Median income
– Anonymized tax data
– Market forces – Labor force – Unemployment BALI – Database
– Education-related employment career monitoring
– collective agreements
– Salary information in advertisements on global job markets
– Modern wage negotiation systems of trade unions and business associations / data 1960 and 2020
– Inflation, productivity, working climate index (AK)
– Job profiles and their task definition/skill sets. – economic relevance models – GDP data, SDI – Sustainable Development Indicators
Index corrected: – according to a points scheme from empirical research results on job satisfaction
– according to surveys and new surveys on the system relevance of professions
– Relevant research data on labor markets – Public welfare balance criteria
– Environmental policy goals
– Social policy goals
– democratic semi-annual surveys
– New Pay for ecosystem services – Value from our own test group with "New Jobs" (Tabakfabrik Linz)
Conclusion
Historically, evolution was in the hands of nature. Now it is suddenly largely in human hands, but we must be careful and use our scientific know-how as responsibly as possible. The task of today's young people, the "Transition Generation", will be to lead humanity through the coming time of chaos, danger and opportunity. In order for them to have a chance to be successful, the older ones have to leave space and resources. One of the forces that is working on a future that continues to be unedifying for most people is the so-called stakeholder capitalism, whose prophets are more likely to be assigned to the corporatocracy and where the signs currently predominate that they want to continue their plunder of the planet essentially undisturbed. By the way, we don't believe that there are particularly evil individuals at work here, not even the so-called ruling class, but rather that the system is currently designed in such a way that greed ruins everything in the end. But there is a much more inconspicuous broad emancipation movement with a gigantic sea of projects that work on the complete opposite. What these projects have in common is that they specifically address civil society solutions to the Great Challenges. When it comes to the topic of work, we include movements such as Transition Towns, D64, the common good economy, post-growth society, solidarity economy and Attac. There is also a growing public backlash against inhumane technology, which has already been identified by the World Economic Forum as a threat and hurdle to overcome. In paternalistic governance efforts for what is supposedly good for people, social engineering and social control are expanded. The “Great Reset” agenda, which has now officially been launched, seeks to guarantee protection from harm that is non-negotiable – in order to reduce concerns and suppress dissent. Basically, it's about building and maintaining the tolerance of the world's population. But if you look at the ongoing conflicts that are currently taking place on the streets – there are the yellow vests, Friday for Future, Blacklife Matters and the fairly opaque composition of various lateral thinkers – or let's say anti-corona protesters – in the German-speaking world, including the climax of the strangely symbolic civil war scenes in the US Capitol, then these are very dark pictures of an escalation of dissent and mistrust of governance with all its characteristics.
Disorientation and escalating protest as a toxic cocktail that of course carries great risks, but which can also shake people awake and make them aware of change. The most beautiful side effect of this “dystopia” is that we can now re-create, re-code life itself. "There's a new world out there and in that new world you can redefine every moment. You can be whoever you damn well want to be!"
We are living through the greatest experiment in human history when it comes to work, given the dramatic change brought about by a simple virus. The health and economic crisis, which we are desperately trying to overcome, is a very good time for change. At this moment, in which the "normal state", the usual processes of a society, are fundamentally disrupted, it becomes clear to what standards everyday life is usually based.
In his play “The Temporary Ones” shortly after the Second World War, Elias Canetti recreated how the relationship between the individual and society can be generally thought of. Of particular importance is the moment of a collective borderline experience, the experience of the dissolution of all social norms. It is this “lawless” experience that we also associate with work and how it will evolve.
NewPay. The momentum is there!
How this “state of emergency” should be assessed politically and culturally is something that even very clever minds differ on. Philosopher Giorgio Agamben, in the first lockdown, lamented the irrevocable loss of our last autonomous spaces for thought and action and the totalitarian triumph of state power. Jean-Luc Nancy and Roberto Esposito contradicted him and explained the lack of alternatives to the concrete measures and at the same time called for a critical examination of the mechanisms of globalization, neoliberalism and biopolitical forms of government. Slavoj Žizek went one better in the debate and saw the real philosophical revolution of events in the fact that the virus could strip away the entire scope of capitalist madness and, on a global level, realign the relationship between people and communities from an existential perspective.
Ultimately, all interpretation is pointless; what comes has to be shaped. Generation Y has the Herculean task to do this and “increased self-attention” is a term that gives hope here.
On the one hand, there is risk aversion, narrow-mindedness, rules, perfectionism and the search for security in teams and peer groups as an expression of the need for stability in the ongoing crisis, a kind of "plush commoning" is paving the way. On the other hand, this generation has an almost religious desire for self-realization, self-economy, multi-optionalism and rejection of traditional Puritan work virtues. Seen positively, it is a new way of being with oneself, a presence that characterizes this generation. You're looking for a sense of belonging, a purpose, perhaps a little meaning. These characteristics are not unimportant when it comes to emancipating New Work.
____
The social think tank New Work-New Culture has been dealing with work matters for 40 years.
In the spirit of Victor J. Papanek – “The green imperative: ecology and ethics in design and architecture” – NANK sees huge potential in the redesign of work and production and seeks and finds answers to the “Great Challenges” with Transition Design.
In recent years, NANK has tried to create positive images for "navigating uncertainty" with various exhibition formats at Ars Electronica and the Vienna Biennale, among other things, and thus raise awareness of solutions to the work dilemma.
NANK Co:llaboratory is a social think tank that researches the 'change of work'
NANK Co:llaboratory conveys the work philosophy concept of 'New Work'
NANK Co:llaboratory develops social design tools around work
Project collaborators: Elodie Bioux, Lisa Kärcher, Frithjof Bergmann, Felix Zabel, Thomas Schneider
























