Token also means memento
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Neïl Beloufa ┻┳ On June 28th Vienna Secession will open the exhibition Pandemic Pandemonium by french artist Neïl Beloufa, in which he deals intensively and in a very exciting way with the potential of NFT’S and their communities as well as crypto economy as a whole. At the heart of the exhibition is a game that can be played both real and digitally, with both artworks and NFT’s to be won. In addition, three „master hosts“ (or „robots“) compete for the attention of visitors. „Each master host has its own Twitter account (Red, Yellow, Blue), where their posts are spoken in real time by IRL robots. Each master host is controlled by 333 minihosts, which represent it. These 999 minihosts are live generative NFT artworks living on the Ethereum blockchain. Their holders are invited to choose, via a sole-access dedicated Discord channel, what the master hosts post on Twitter and, consequently, what the IRLs will say.“
Token | Art | NFT
New Work, Social Token, Crypto Commons, The „greeness“ of DLT Technology
Lecture and talk at the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna
Token also means memento
Participation in NFT artworks is much more about growing than dividing. With the DLT application of inscribing shares in a work of art in the blockchain, a community of practice is triggered. Participation in the form of a few pixels in the digital Genesis Token of the masterpiece `The Kiss` by Klimt was only the beginning of a process for the museum Belvedere. Nothing less than the concept of „legitimate peripheral participation“ as a kind of „bridge concept“ of the digital transformation of art, museums and knowledge was thus technologically reinforced.
Ex Machina 2.0
A conversation with Digital Cooperativist Thomas Schneider
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
┻┳
Social Design on Workᴺᶠᵀ
new social models with collective production and fair consumption of use value
WWTF Arts&Science, Prix Ars Electronica, Vienna Biennale,
┳┻|
code întuitif
newwork-newculture
artèQ
Token and Society
Digitization is going wrong in many respects. Taxi-driver are losing out to Uber, hotels to Airbnb, stores to Amazon.
In China, Tencent, Alibaba, and others are working closely with the government on total citizen control. The West is following.
Until now, digitization has run on a 20th century operating system. We need something new and decentralized. NFT, Crypto Commons, DAOs are a great tool set for that.
I spend a lot of time thinking about the future of society, and the development towards a hybrid digital-physical world is in full swing. In my opinion, it would be counterproductive to try to stop this, but it is better to shape the change offensively and the analog and digital will now inexorably become more closely intertwined with all the advantages and disadvantages. I am more concerned about the speed at which all this is happening and would prefer to install digital-analog braking systems. Anyway, NFTs are an important particle in this coding-biological transformation.
For myself, human nature and code have been important topics since the Ars Electronica days. Then in 2017, in the wake of the first blockchain applications, I founded code întuitif.
One of the nudges for this was actually a place that fascinates me. The global seed chamber in Svalbard. What few people know is that right next to the seeds are the GitHub code open source repositories stored for eternity.
There is something deeply fascinating and disturbing about seeds and code being buried underground so that we can reuse them in the future if a disaster wipes out all other known safety repositories.
Essentially, though, my NFT fascination is the living thing, that the digital never becomes solid, never dries, is actually a constant process, and NFT is lived community of practice.
Apart from the fact that the digital has influenced art since a long time / e.g. Herbert Franke / there is a lot of cool digital art shit out there.
Herbert W. Franke (born 14 May 1927 in Vienna) is an Austrian scientist and writer. Die Zeit calls him „the most prominent German writing Science Fiction author“. He is also one of the important early computer artists (and collectors), creating computer graphics and early digital art since the late 1950s. Franke is also active in the fields of future research as well as speleology. He uses his pen name Sergius Both as this Avatar name in Active Worlds and Opensimulator grids. The Sergius Both Award is given for creative scripting in Immersionskunst by Stiftung Kunstinformatik, first time issued at Amerika Art 2022.
Another Pioneer; Titus Leber :
Titus Leber is an Austrian screenwriter and director of music feature films and is considered to be one of the creative pioneers of the transitional phase from the analogue to the digital age. From 1984-1985 Titus worked as Research Fellow at the Center for Advanced Visual Studies (CAVS) at MIT. There he developed his „Image Reactor“®, an interactive Laser-Disc installation using complex permutative image-matrixes to simulate visual thinking. Early publications on artificial intelligence in the arts.
And there is far too often, unfortunately unnoticed, new superb original digital art in the field. One of my absolute favorites is Nikita Diakur
Exciting artistic as well as social aspects.
Entropies are NFT artworks that evolve each time they are transferred from one person to another. With each transfer of purses, an entropes inherits, blends, and imprints its genomic history onto a visual canvas. Here, different layers interweave.
Originator Circle — Buyer Circle —
„When you buy an entropy, a circle is added and connected to the last circle in the chain. Each circle and connector has a unique genome based not only on the address of the buyer’s wallet, but also on the unique chain of previous owners.“
Let’s face it: The NFT space moves really fast. Considering how quickly things can change in the metaverse, a week in NFTs might as well be a month IRL. Don’t get us wrong — the more people onboarded into the space, the merrier.
Ex Machina 2.0
When people ‚make‘ something, these ‚products‘ and ’services‘ always emerge in a practical life context and through confrontations; very different people can be more or less actively involved: In the ‚making‘ of an NFT project, for example, not only programmers are involved, but also buyers, art mediators, advertisers, tour operators, clients, etc.
In the process, therefore, two things are produced: a product or a service and, at the same time, a social context.
In this perspective, the production process is no longer ‚only‘ a temporally limited production process that is only oriented towards a product: the production process is much more a complex context – similar in its structure to a landscape in which diverse relationships exist between different people/contexts. What emerges or develops in the process are not so much finished end products, but rather ‚productions‘ in the sense of artifactual constellations of meaning. The concrete product gains a different status: it becomes significant as a projection of social-cultural contexts. Seen in this way, in a concrete ‚product‘ – a ‚ledger‘ – different people with their abilities, skills, experiences, knowledge, feelings, their history, as well as work practices, means of work, material, work relations and work references are always present as human social potentiality. By entering into a relationship with this socially structured world, people are able to participate in the procedures and processes.
The perspective of participation is thus always to be understood in a relational dimension of meaning and as a movement of approach. At the same time, it becomes apparent that only by means of and through participation in a social practice can a relationship of the individual to the (life) world be established, formed and deepened. People take advantage of this possibility when they come together in informal practice contexts, meet, exchange and communicate. It therefore makes sense to understand the cultural practice of communalization from the perspective of the ‚changes‘ taking place in the process much more comprehensively as a digital transformation that shapes new cultural techniques.
Freedom! calls reason, freedom! the wild desire. – Clearly, however, NFT is also very much about making a living with art.
Money is one of the oldest and most powerful memes — the cultural counterpart of genes, passed down generation to generation. Our culture would be entirely unrecognizable without money at its center — even something as fundamental as writing came about through the need for better accounting systems in 3500 BC. In more modern times, money is best understood by its three primary functions: store of value, unit of account and medium of exchange.
While the idea of fetching a six-figure payday for the latest trending digital art piece has been a major factor in the attention placed on the sector, the truth is that the cryptoindustry has only scratched the surface of what NFT technology is capable of.
Intellectual property and patents
NFTs are ideal for tracking intellectual property (IP) and patents as they take the current system of trademarks and copyrights to the next level by offering a way to prove ownership of any piece of content.
The data-keeping capabilities of blockchain technology allow for the entire history of a piece of IP to be tracked and timestamped, offering a way to provide undeniable ownership. Ticketing and rewards programs One use case for NFTs that is already being explored and implemented in entertainment venues around the world is in the creation of tickets or passes to events. The ability to create an unlimited number of unique NFTs allows venues like concert halls and sports arenas to issue tickets for entry as NFTs that can be easily verified or transferred. The prevalence of smartphones across society has made digital ticketing possible, and the integration of NFT technology will help to make this process more efficient and easier to track. Companies can set up rewards programs where participants are given NFTs that are used to track purchases or activities within the organization for rewards purposes. Instead of issuing physical cards or tracking activity by phone number, which exposes an important piece of personal information, activities can be tracked via an NFT that is scanned without revealing any other information. Exclusive memberships A final application of NFT technology is as a general utility token that performs a specific function, like verifying membership to an exclusive club or providing access to a certain service. This is a function that is already being employed by a number of NFT projects where they have a website or Discord group that can only be accessed after verifying ownership of an NFT from that particular collection. The applications of this idea are wide-ranging and run the gamut, from content creators offering fans exclusive access to songs if they hold an NFT released by that musician to secret societies allowing rare NFT holders to access their sacred libraries.
motion nft
My contribution for #Fear4TEZ is actually pretty dark, don't you think so? But I like it! 😈
卩乇尺丂ㄖ几卂ㄥ 卄乇ㄥㄥ
50/130, 1 tezzie🔊 sound on!!! (very important)
and check the original on @versumofficial please, it's a beautiful 4K video.
🔗👇 pic.twitter.com/miC7yrrxka— Kika Nicolela (@kikanicolela) May 12, 2022
Omg, it's so amazing! https://t.co/Xth2IxJNr1
— no_mad. (@neon_based) May 12, 2022
https://twitter.com/i/status/1503013754648281088
NO.O34 pic.twitter.com/fXpW4dr4yW
— CUBE (@cube_nft) March 20, 2022
https://twitter.com/ProfessorJun_/status/1508509395839238145?s=20&t=ML-8RGaSJM8ZxK15GfEWww
https://twitter.com/ina_vare/status/1508778979829989376?s=20&t=ML-8RGaSJM8ZxK15GfEWww
https://muse0.xyz/
We think we are in control.
We believe that our conscious mind directs our thoughts and somehow controls our subconscious.
It was wrong.Fractures Vol.1#NFTCollection
Sound on! 🔊
5 #NFTs 10/10 ed.
11-17 #XTZ pic.twitter.com/FRZfYZNE2P— Dome.th (@DomVisionR) March 29, 2022
⭐️⭐️⭐️ PHOTOSENSITIVE WARNING ⭐️⭐️⭐️
👽🛸📺 I'LL BE RIGHT HERE… 📺🛸👽
*** 100% Analog Glitch – No Software Retouch ***
3 editions
I will be accepting the 3 highest offers on Wednesday at 9:30PM EST – 48 hours from now!
Link 👇 pic.twitter.com/AwE72o0gkL
— 📺⚡️PHOSPHOR OPERATOR⚡️📺 (@Pho_Operator) March 29, 2022
good nfts
Let's go! 💥
'Aquamarine Memories' #3 Night Thoughts (third of three-piece collection) out now on @KnownOrigin.io via@AdoptionNFT Gallery.1 of 3 Editions • Now Available for Ξ 0.11#cryptoart #NFT #cryptoartist #ETH #AudioVisual #RetroFuture #SciFi pic.twitter.com/4jQKvvh1qW
— Railster (@Railster) December 3, 2021
https://twitter.com/jdotcolombo/status/1466723812037120001?s=20
Loving this new ASCII converter. ❤️🔥
Only 80×80 characters in resolution, but the fact that it follows the contrast lines really makes the details pop. 🙂🙃🔄
For sure going to make a new collection with it 👀 pic.twitter.com/59yiFlEI5o
— 1mposter (@_1mposter) April 18, 2022
Art by @andreasgysin pic.twitter.com/2iz00DFaEL
— ArtIsHack (@ArtIsHack) April 19, 2022
Entering the Metaverse
The metaverse is a lofty, nebulous concept. It’s also a violet-colored storefront on Franklin Street in New York.
The term Web3 is useless. What is different now is transparency on Blockchain, auditable smart contracts, decentralized decision making. All can enable entrepreneurs to create more productive and appealing Dapps.
NFTs are a simple example. Taking digital files, applying smart contracts to enable royalties/extractable info. Blockchain to publicly/transparently show provenance/trx history. Decentralized makes it more trusted than centralized
More advanced are trustless insurance policies via smart contracts using public standardized data like weather to simplify/speed up sales and pay outs
With Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube you invite your friends to participate, you generate content together, and the platforms make money.
With Web3 you invite your friends to participate, you generate content together, and you all make money.
The world is now more interested in APIs than atoms, and Web3 is redefining the internet and its activities. Take, for example, @subsquid, whose in-house Hydra protocol accomplishes in seconds what other query platforms take minutes to accomplish.
This space is obviously for everyone and it’s inclusive. I just want to see it built by us, for us. If the VCs want to show support then great! But I see opportunistic behavior as a turnoff. Passion is better.
1/ Y’all got it wrong. Web 2 is just the aggregate of all the websites that allow for users to contribute rather than the „consume only“ model of web 1. Web 3 is just the aggregate of the protocols that allow trading and usage of value. The most famous of which is Bitcoin.
2/ Structurally, web 3 runs on the same old ISP’s we’ve always used, centralized entities that control the gates of the internet. Web 4 will entail becoming your own ISP. #BULLISHv
NFT Pioneer Olive Allen Wants to Introduce the Art World to the Metaverse. Her Vision of the Future Looks Nothing Like Zuckerberg’s
At least that’s the idea behind Olive Allen’s new exhibition at Postmasters Gallery, which purports to recreate the Web3 world within the white cube. The title doubles as an ominous invitation: ”Welcome to the Metaverse.”
With its cheap, roller-rink lighting and glitchy soundtrack, Allen’s exhibition doesn’t actually capture the essence of the metaverse—at least not the utopian vision peddled by Mark Zuckerberg and other tech evangelists. But it does get at some of the affects we associate with the word in 2022: ‘90s nostalgia, corporate co-optation, video-game aesthetics, venomous reply-guy vibes.
NFTs Started ‘a Digital Art Renaissance.’ It’s Far From Over
As the .ART domain registry marks its fifth anniversary, digital artists hail a revolution in their industry.
Digital art was born in the 1960s, but the 2020s will surely go down as the era when the medium came into its own, and turned the art industry upside down in the process.
Technology, in the form of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) such as CryptoPunks, has played a key role in disrupting traditional art-market dynamics. Online marketplaces and platforms have enabled artists to dispense with gatekeepers, birthing a billion-dollar business that favors creators.
“The art landscape changed when CryptoPunks launched in 2017, and everyone realized art can be traded and exchanged through NFTs,” Singaporean digital artist Metalman, told Decrypt.
He and others describe a transformation that helped online art sales double in 2021, per a report by art organization Art Basel. Accelerating this shift online, platforms such as domain registry .ART—which marks its fifth anniversary this month—have enabled creators to anchor their collections, form communities and reach new audiences.
A new renaissance
“In the past five years, especially in the last two, the interest [in] and perceived value of digital art has dramatically increased,” according to Katelyn DeVan, a digital artist who’s used the .ART platform to reach a global audience from her Ohio studio.
“Blockchain technology, and NFTs in particular, have sparked what I describe as a ‚digital art renaissance,’” she asserts. “Digital art is no longer seen as merely a niche collectable, but also an investment.”
This transformation has been helped along by the pandemic, which led online art sales to surge from 9% to 25% of total global art sales in 2021, according to Art Basel.
„Blockchain technology, and NFTs in particular, have sparked what I describe as a ‚digital art renaissance.'“
But the culture is changing too. With no middlemen, artists are able to form deeper connections with collectors—and NFTs have helped to instigate a shift from consumption to sharing, according to .ART founder Ulvi Kasimov.
Liberating artists from their modern-day garrets
“With NFTs, there is a better chance for every artist to become independent. Instead of working for a big corp, you can make a living producing art, it’s definitely a big factor,” says award-winning, Vancouver-based artist Tadeusz Chmiel.

A .ART user, Chmiel has worked in both the digital and physical spheres; as well as painting in oils, he’s created stunning digital work for Star Wars, Marvel and Disney films.
In recent years, he says, “creating digital art has become much more accessible and fun. The hardware is faster, the software is easier (and often free) and there is a video tutorial for almost everything you need.”
Ukrainian artist Stepan Ryabchenko is an early .ART adopter, and believes that “digital art has become a mass phenomenon due to the global trend of virtualization in all areas, including the gradual transition to digital currency.”
He argues that digital currency is the primary factor that led to the growth of interest in digital art, with NFTs bridging the transition and providing “the cultural component.”
This piece presents the concept of “Metaverse Cities”, as an exploration of how “crypto cities” and “crypto states” are melding with the physical infrastructure of cities to offer new potentialities in how people organize, work, rest, and play. It forms a contribution to a broader project by RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub on “The Digital CBD”.
The Metaverse
The concept of “The Metaverse” refers to the linking of digital and physical spaces (Dionisio, et. al. 2013; Nabben, 2021) that seamlessly integrates the physical world with the virtual world. This allows avatars to carry out rich activities including creation, display, entertainment, social networking, and trading, hybridizing work, rest, and play between physical and virtual reality (Ynag, et. al. 2022). The Metaverse is not a singular place but any virtual reality (digital space) or augmented reality (physical space enhanced by a digital overlay) that is accessed through computer interfaces. This layering over of existing media forms establishes the immersive potential of a mixed media reality. The Metaverse introduces a new era in technology entrepreneurship and digital innovations, introducing new business models, and modes of work and leisure and cultural experience and expression (Momtaz, 2022). It is the next chapter for social, cultural, and economic practice across both digital and physical spaces.
In 2021, Seoul Metropolitan Government announced its intention to invest $3.3 million to become the first city to immerse itself in the metaverse, including hosting cultural events in the Metaverse to attract global tourism, a virtual city hall for citizens to interact with public officials and access services, and community recreation spaces (Seoul Metropolitan Government, 2021).
NFTs as a springboard to Web3
Artists praised the clean look of the .ART platform, and the benefits of using its domain registry. They chose .ART to showcase their portfolio as it reflects precisely what industry they are in and it gives a ‘prestigious’ feeling of being part of the art community.
It’s a community within an ecosystem that’s rapidly evolving and seeking out new platforms; I would highlight the need for a curated space where artists can meet, that’s better organized than Twitter, Instagram or Discord.
And I want to point to the challenges that still need to be overcome in “digital security, art theft and copyright law.”
The future of digital art
Not all the artists I spoke to are in agreement about the role of NFTs in the future.
Thomas Obermeir, a German digital artist who specializes in software as art, has worked in the digital field for decades, and said that “NFTs are overhyped and will eventually disappear.”
Ryabchenko, in contrast, believed that NFTs—this new “digital fever,” as he describes it—have plenty of room to grow. But he predicted that physical art and space will soon be increasingly in demand. After all, he argues, man is made of matter and is drawn to matter.
„Having a way to digitally sign and track sales of the artwork is huge.“
It serves to bridge the digital world with the traditional galleries, museums and auction houses, in a period of rapid transformation—where internet and blockchain technologies have invited comparisons with the role of the printing press and accounting ledger in the European Renaissance.
But there’s a vital difference: in the 15th Century, the Renaissance was restricted to Europe; what’s happening today is on a global scale, at an unparalleled velocity.

________________
The 10 point life jacket against green bashing by NFT
┳┻|
┳┻| Version 2.0/5.4.2022 artèQ
1. propaganda with adventurously estimated numbers.
Zero Knowledge represents on the one hand a promising solution to an old problem in cryptography, but also the many scrambling critics of the NFT footprint. It is amazing what misinformation is spread about it. It may be well-intentioned (or maybe not), but arbitrary numbers and data are being conjured up to attack artists, art collectors, and museums for participating in a larger, democratic ecosystem of the future. The power for this ecosystem comes from billions of outlets, and so the numbers cannot be particularly realistically estimated, let alone accurately calculated. Consequently, based on still reasonably realistic calculations and estimates of electricity consumption, there are studies by hyper-accurate scientists regarding CO2 consumption that range from 1.2 to 130.5 megatons of CO₂ per year. Well, that’s about as accurate as it gets.
2. mines and transactions on the chain are different pairs of shoes.
Calculating the CO₂ footprint based on the number of transactions in NFT production is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how Ethereum works. Any argument along these lines is inherently flawed because blocks are produced regardless of the number of transactions.
3. NFTs are a small subset of blockchain applications.
Moreover, the majority of activity on Ethereum has nothing to do with NFTs, but rather with DeFi, for example. Therefore, it does not make sense to attack this very small subset at the large crypto scene.
4. the NFT scene is working systemically towards a greener future.
Pure proof-of-work systems are being phased out. We have 50+ L2 solutions already NOW! While optimistic rollups (like @arbitrum) and SideChains (like @0xPolygon PoS chain) are incredible advances, it seems clear that the optimal mix of security and scalability will come from ZK rollups (Zero Knowledge Proofs).
This is something we have been working on for years. Ethereum has introduced the division into Execution Layer and Consensus Layer and at the moment is progressing step by step with `greener`while secure upgrades Beacon-Chain / Merge / Shard Chains. All major marketplaces are implementing L2s layers which completely mitigate all the allegations.
5. the problem concerns only the cryptology aspect.
It is also not possible to speak of an NFT problem, but one of the partial aspect of consensus mechanism and cryptology, which is permanently being worked on in order to make the function-critical data handling balanced, secure and energy-saving. The proof-of-work problem arises because this consensus mechanism currently still has its advantages in terms of security and decentralization. For particularly high-value usage scenarios, this form is still recommended, especially from a security perspective. Scaling a blockchain requires either a collective shift of mining activities to supercomputers, which contradicts decentralization due to expensive hardware requirements, or incremental software refinement, which is slow and tedious and always carries the risk of fragmenting communities. Examples include proof of stake and delegated proof of stake protocols, which significantly increase throughput and reduce power consumption, but require more complex game-theoretic security analysis. They risk undermining the security architecture of trusted distributed systems by reducing the redundancy and thus the power required to successfully attack the valid completion of a single task.
6. even in pure POW systems, power consumption does not correlate with the number of transactions.
For Proof of Work, the number of transactions has little to no impact on Ethereum’s carbon footprint. NFT’s are particularly „light“ in terms of number of transactions, but even that is actually irrelevant because block size has no correlation to carbon footprint. Blocks are created with 0 transactions or with high transaction capacities. The environmental cost remains exactly the same.
7. the art NFT market demands miners to be more green
The NFT scene within the blockchain community is extremely behind the fact that the footprint plays a central role, the only valid argument that they are also environmentally harmful is that participation in the art NFT market, increases activity overall and thus affects the price of mining. Therefore, this generally becomes more attractive and brings more miners to the start.
8. blockchain supports the development of sustainable energy infrastructure.
GPU mining spinning out at PROTOCOL level (e.g. ETH2.0) represents highly professional industrial mining mostly powered by geothermal energy surplus in Iceland, renewable energy surplus in wind power and by means of many other renewable energies.
9. how much energy does 5G or the US military eat? Consider proportionality!
There is a lot of justified criticism of the NFT and metaverses, for example on their general quality, design, or regarding unresolved plagiarism issues, and we generally welcome an informed discussion on this. The arguments in this regard span a huge arc between the assessment in the crypto commons scene that NFT and DAO’s have social revolutionary potential – „Let’s fix the World“ – (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2021.578721/full#footnote20 ) and blank scorn among skeptical nerd observers with the view that NFT’s are bare garbage (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g).
We are happy to discuss this, but if the consumption of energy is not put in relation to the actual purpose of the application, and not in relation to other more or less useful technological applications such as our satellite network, SWIFT, 5G or streaming, it is simply extremely manipulative and unfair to talk about the environmental impact of NFT.
10. there are numerous sustainable projects that can only be implemented with crypto and NFT.
The UN has explicitly acknowledged the great potential of this technology to solve major unresolved value, logistics, and material problems. There are good arguments why it could be just the other way around: proof of work has extraordinarily green aspects. Linking a limited currency to power consumption, as is the case with Bitcoin and Ethereum, links a noncompromisable value system to energy. What do they think happens to the money that central banks print? I think it’s clear as day that it doesn’t save energy.
Even in the arts, this technology is already making it possible to rethink a lot of transportation miles and festival and conference flights. But the real benefit of digital transformation in the arts is storytelling, which is only in its infancy, and the possibilities of art communication over distant distances.
1HWork



Tjark reads his deportation notice and can't believe it. He has been working unregistered for a temporary employment agency for a few months now and keeps himself afloat by providing support services in various care facilities. Mirko his boss was happy with him. He earned 370 euros this week. It looked so good! Now it says he has to go back to Afghanistan. His flight costs the state about twice as much.
Hanno the Uber driver is sleeping in his car. He's just doing this so he doesn't get fired. Because if he doesn't respond immediately to his algorithm-controlled service app, there will be trouble with the boss. So he has set an alarm that lets him start up reliably every time the city and the company think they can use his driving talent again.
Selma Ennaifer, the Tunisian Foreign Minister, speaks to representatives of the European Commission in an almost pleading tone. The reason? The EU's travel restrictions due to the pandemic mean that 70 percent (!) of the businesses in Tunisia, a tourist destination, have to close.
Three very different stories and yet similarly symbolic of the misery we are in. The examples have the theme of work and failure in common. In particular, it becomes clear which serious systemic errors are built into the current globally oriented work organization.

Growing up relatively sheltered, I experienced gainful employment as a strange attempt at oppression. Starting with enveloping for a clothing company, through jobs in call centers and finally at the ORF, I learned early on to lack freedom. Since life is not a jump-and-run game where you have 3 lives, I started my own personal liberation movement after my studies and became self-employed in the creative field. I have reorganized education, training and work for myself and have since spent a considerable amount of time initiating projects that deal with finding out how we as a society could escape from the captivity of the job system.
Utopia for Realists
With digitalization, workplaces cease to be fixed places and begin to transform into states. In this article I want to get you to think about these conditions together with New Work-New Culture. We could philosophize, dream, and ponder for 10 minutes about how we can ensure, in the rapidly accelerating transformation process of work, that we achieve something better in the end.
A key to this is Bergmann's concept of “really, really wanting”. The New Work “WWW” has little or nothing to do with self-realization and self-optimization. According to Bergmann, New Work is not about a little improvement, not about job crafting. New Work – New culture doesn't just touch the surface and esotericism is a horror for us. NANK is an evolutionary, philosophical concept of freedom with a focus on work.

Work goes deep into the understanding of personality and the values and core beliefs associated with it. It also comprehensively defines and dominates relationship values in the world. New Work, as Frithjof Bergmann sees it, has nothing to do with love bombing, shining in the sun or the value of being used in itself. It is much more about the intrinsic motivation of what is present within oneself and how strongly it is perceived. In comparison to the power of external influences, people's own desires do not pull with strong ropes, but hang on a thin and easily torn, delicate thread. New Work calls this phenomenon the “poverty of desire”. The human being itself is far too often, first and foremost, weak and fragile. People quickly become discouraged, depressed and tame. Therefore, it is easy to intimidate or even train people, and many people are shy and withdrawn. Frithjof Bergmann also calls the phenomenon self-ignorance; beyond the individual, he speaks of the “concept of unlived life,” which often shapes working society. Handle
In the first part of this article, which can be read in about 7 minutes, I would like to outline Bergmann's New Work in more detail and embed it in the current socio-political context. It will be an attempt to position the essential elements, calling and community production, within the changing economic framework. The second part is about what role digitalization plays in the transformation process of work, what is going wrong and how we could transfer this into a new, more humane era. I refer to the current developments surrounding COVID and the long-term major forces of democratization, automation, globalization and monetary control. In the last part, I present our current approach to how a technological tool could be used to specifically improve the situation on the labor market. "Ø – The value of an hour of work" attempts to develop a value system for work secured using DLT (Blockchain) technology. Ø is an index that uses artificial intelligence to learn how to correct incorrect dispositions and unequal evaluations of work and systemic errors in salary issues. From data already collected, supplemented with new evaluation approaches, a factor is calculated by which an existing remuneration should be multiplied in order to better reflect the social value of a job. So that as little ideology as possible sets the tone, we try to capture the activities themselves with a matrix of skillsets.
Both soft factors such as creativity and empathy as well as hard criteria such as the level of education required for this activity or the average work speed are taken into account.

work is the change machine
I
In the part-time review that we call work, we slowly come to the realization that we as a society are somehow stuck when it comes to work. Economic growth madness, automation. Digitalization. It doesn't go forward or back. According to Bergmann, New Work has been thinking about why this is and how we could change it for 40 years and is proposing something new. New Work-New Culture firmly believes that with smart changes to the work system we can have a positive impact on the whole world. Calling – the intrinsic calling – linked to collaborative production methods will revolutionize working life and the way we live. Technologically, the unimaginable is already possible. As a private person, you can dock your phone to the AI "GPT-3" and have a universe of possibilities that goes beyond your imagination and initially flattens you in its abundance. For example, you can have fictitious conversations with Thunberg, Chomsky, Musk, Obama, the Pope or the Chinese civil rights activist Wei Jingsheng. For example, if you ask what is going wrong with digitalization and what the next right step would be, artificial intelligence provides the answer from the data of the published statements of these thinkers that it is up to us whether it turns out badly or well. But there are also amazingly more useful, logical and authentic-sounding answers to the really pressing questions of our time. Even scientists who work on it are left with a feeling somewhere between euphoria and bewilderment when they propose solutions to the climate problem. In some cases, these experts can no longer even understand exactly how AI comes up with its solutions when it invents new things in goods logistics, resource conservation and smart health robotics. Theoretically, everyone with the Internet has swarm intelligence in their pocket as a tool for making decisions. Theoretically, firstly, access is limited and secondly, this oracle is the machine learning substrate of “everyone’s opinion”. The question is not just philosophical but quite practical as to whether this really has anything to do with intelligence. This supposedly collectively secured data is available from the perspective of a programmer and an institution that decides on the data composition of the model. To what extent this data is ethically compromised, to what extent it is just mainstream, to what extent it is the devil is currently being researched. What we already know is that they are similar to Wikipedia, white, male and dominated by rich countries.
New Work, with its approach of listening individually to what you need and what you want, helps you navigate uncertainty. When it comes to entering this wide, white and uncharted field of new possibilities, we need a strong inner compass. Because, despite the revolutionary framework, there may still be a marathon ahead of us before we synchronize sufficiently and develop common cultural techniques that raise the potential of what is possible and ultimately enable a better life for many. But what we are already dealing with is an acceleration of transformation processes, which people are sometimes facing with fear. There has always been change, especially at work. But now we see the beginning of a new era. On the one hand, it is the obvious acceleration of upheavals that provides good reasons to speak of a new era. But it is also the nature of the fragility. As Václav Havel once said, it is as if something were exhausting and destroying itself. But what now rises from the rubble? How can we deal with these breaks? New Work – New Culture is interested in the symptoms of decay and departure and the contradictions as an expression of a deeper transformation of work as we know it. When it comes to work and meaning, we still long for something different. It is not yet possible to define this other. But the fog is clearing. A first idea of what the new thing could look like grows as the offspring of a kind of collective longing. What we are seeing now is that a new form of being present and being present is emerging. This presence not only has something to do with digital 5G acceleration, but also something to do with authenticity, with being close to what you do every day.

Industrial Age – Information Age – Augmented Age
From the very beginning – and that was back in the 70s – the New Work did not want to regret the end of the job system, but rather to celebrate it frenetically. As Hegelians, we believe that we are not born free from the beginning, but that the path to freedom is difficult to achieve. And the job system has made people terribly unfree. In the classic wage-earning society, optimizing a company means optimizing “human resources”. People with individual wishes, skills and living conditions are referred to as resources and we want to use them as willing employees as multi-flexibly and effectively as possible. More and more people, and not just since Corona, are no longer playing along. People fall out of their roles, things are no longer in their place. Politicians have looked at continuities for too long and overlooked the radical epochal break around 1980. The topics have changed. An entire intellectual coordinate system has shifted: people, torn between the individual and society, oscillating between the individual psyche and that of the masses, the individual's body bent into the social body. There is also a pull from desire to need, from a vertical to a horizontal order. In this situation, New Work calls for a sustainable strengthening of the individual's free will and a collaborative spirit. Finding out what you want, finding your calling, can help defuse problems when navigating uncertainty if we allow a little more flamboyance for what is “naturally possible”. During the industrial era, the vast majority of work was done using muscle power; it was dull, grueling, exhausting backbreaking work. In the post-industrial age, this work is almost entirely done by machines. The first “Dark Factories” are in Taipei. The production halls there remain dark because in normal operation only robots with sensors and not a single person work. Regardless of the current flight restrictions, Lufthansa has plans in place to manage business in the future with 40,000 fewer employees. It is estimated that artificial intelligence and augmented reality will make 30-50 percent of current jobs obsolete in the next 10 years. Maxim
What will we work on? We don't know for sure. But what we can say is that the work will not stop. In order to overcome the "Great Challenges" – poverty, environment, health – in society, billions of people can and must get involved.
If we let machines do the dull work, two thirds of all work could be employment that makes you stronger, that is tailored to you, that advances you, that serves your self-realization. This represents enormous progress, because in the past only small privileged elites – artists, intellectuals and inventors – could enjoy the hearty lifeblood of such work. A cleverly linked network of collaboration, combined with entrepreneurship and fair remuneration mechanisms, can offer protection against job loss, downward mobility and poverty. The core message: 'Work on what you really, really want!' This important nucleus of freedom joins research and discovery in 'Community Production' and combines work on hi-tech machines with a good touch of entrepreneurial spirit.

The Value of Work
The way in which the current economic reference system has systemically anchored the exchange of goods for the last 150 years has weakened people. They have merely tamed it and not developed it. In addition, this modern, Western materialism only works slowly. Japan has not produced any significant economic growth for decades, although perversely the ongoing costs of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima and the protests over it are, for example, taken into account as 'growth'.
The current understanding of economics is very narrow. Areas such as social care, family and reproductive work are systematically undervalued, and art and culture and the realities of life of marginalized groups are negated. Not least because of this, work is increasingly confronted with an inclusion logic of meaning, intimacy, concern and inclination. Mass production is not focused on creating cultural richness, diversity and inclusion. After 20 years of optimization efficiency, the richness has been consistently slowed down. If society wants to move away from mass production because other needs come to the fore, then we must necessarily ask ourselves: is the organization of work and production that we have the best possible way to unleash creativity and innovation?

money and work
In view of the change in the value and the meaning of the concept of goods itself, New Work is convinced that the value of work can also be completely reassessed. Up to now, money has been more of a lubricant for many things to fail in the end. A real store of value for work could be the lubricant that makes it all work. In order to regain more mining rights to life, we could empower people with a new form of work organization and work evaluation. We could experience a rise instead of an exhaustion of people with the digital and we could move more and more towards a culture of freedom. We just haven't really learned yet how to remelt and reshape our centuries-old collective patterns of thinking, speaking and institutionalization to fit the new realities. In this space of possibilities, in Walter Benjamin's “now time”, New Work-New Culture has arguments, images, terms and tools, where it seems so difficult to develop an emancipatory vision of the future and to look for ways to realize it in the here and now.
The Epic Conversation About the US Dollar System with Macro Analyst Luke Gromen from April 2020
One of the most important macroeconomic questions facing the world is the future of the global reserve system, which has been dominated by the US dollar for the last 80 years.
The topics in conversation:
Bretton Woods and why the world went for a USD-based system and not John Maynard Keynes' idea of a non-sovereign "Bancor" world reserve currency.
The transition to petrodollars in the 1970s.
The financialization of commodities that began in the 1980s.
The monetary policy vacuum after the end of the Cold War.
How a Shift in Executive Compensation Rules Led to Many of Today's Problems with Wall Street.
The export of treasury bonds as a business model.
The economic impact of 2008 worldwide and domestically.
The end of the purchase of Treasury bonds in 2014.
Why the Federal Reserve is the only sugar daddy left.


Using Digitalization for a New Money and Value System
II
Digitalization is one of the big drivers of change in work. But the digital revolution is going wrong. We seem to be losing to the algorithms. Everything is regulated, used and accounted for and what is humane is crushed between the bits and bytes. Inequality continues to rise. The distribution of knowledge and resources as well as the value chains are distributed even more inhomogeneously globally, nationally and locally due to digitalization and the associated automation and production changes.
crime scenes
Change in production is at the same time a change in the value of labor. Work performance and its value have become largely decoupled from fair pay in real stores of value. Given the effects of digitalization, the value creation regime is currently changing. The practices of production and consumption are changing towards open, distributed and feedback forms of production. New forms of collaboration are becoming more relevant and decentralization and fair value exchange are taking shape.
Here too, the magnifying glass of the corona and economic crisis highlights the extent of the distortion and ruthlessly exposes weak points. Where digitalization, communication and synchronization succeed, work works. Mobile office and homeschooling are not an option for precarious professional groups. The 21st century digital economy runs on a 20th century operating system. The big tech companies like Tencent, Facebook, Google, Alibaba, Tesla, Netflix are single-handedly hijacking NASDAQ & Co. during Corona. The platform's feudalism à la Amazon is becoming obvious in its frightening power potential.
Instead of this monopoly and surveillance capitalism, New Work strives for an economic circular system of global neighborhoods with balanced production and use: decentralized, regional collaboration in the form of 'community production' as a kind of basic economy; concrete substrates of freedom in the form of access to infrastructure and commons for people instead of a basic income. Community workshops for this purpose are being set up around the world and are astonishing with their production capacities. The 'Grande Garage' in the Linz tobacco factory is around 4,000 square meters and is equipped with, among other things, high-performance fabricators, laser cutters, computer-controlled milling machines and industrial robots. Researchers, industry and start-ups, but also students, artists and grandfathers are allowed to work, design and make prototypes there.


Leaving the Value of Work to Computers?
III
Digital systems, especially artificial intelligence, are at the beginning of their development history and valid results from technology assessments are only slowly arriving. What has emerged is that there are many ethical questions that need to be negotiated and require democratic consensus, which the legislature then has to take into account. The issue of security and control is also a substantial one. Both regulatory trends and completely free, bottom-up initiatives are emerging here.
We must see the digital as a new form of craft
New Work according to Bergmann, it is important that constitutional and relationship values are the benchmark for the use of technology. The success of relationships is currently being undermined by economics. Alternative work and remuneration models therefore urgently need to be developed. “New Pay” is currently more likely to be reduced to the renewal of compensation models within an organization. But we need a new approach to interdisciplinary compensation. What we are proposing is just a correction factor to the so-called "free labor market" so that the acceptance of such re-evaluated work performance among the traditional stakeholders in wage issues – the business people and trade unions – increases.
Ø – An AI- and Blockchain-Supported Index for the Value of Work
The index Ø attempts to reduce misallocations in existing calculation approaches for wages by taking correction parameters into account. Here is a rough overview: The index learns from: – Median income
– Anonymized tax data
– Market forces – Labor force – Unemployment BALI – Database
– Education-related employment career monitoring
– collective agreements
– Salary information in advertisements on global job markets
– Modern wage negotiation systems of trade unions and business associations / data 1960 and 2020
– Inflation, productivity, working climate index (AK)
– Job profiles and their task definition/skill sets. – economic relevance models – GDP data, SDI – Sustainable Development Indicators
Index corrected: – according to a points scheme from empirical research results on job satisfaction
– according to surveys and new surveys on the system relevance of professions
– Relevant research data on labor markets – Public welfare balance criteria
– Environmental policy goals
– Social policy goals
– democratic semi-annual surveys
– New Pay for ecosystem services – Value from our own test group with "New Jobs" (Tabakfabrik Linz)
In the future, the index should also take soft facts such as happiness, trust, fear, stress, long-term presence, etc. into account. What we are currently working particularly hard on is, on the one hand, distilling the large amount of existing index data into work and integrating it into the correction in a properly weighted manner. On the other hand, the index tool should ultimately remain simple despite the variety of influencing factors that have to be taken into account. A display that works something like the app with information about electricity consumption in Japan in 2011 would be ideal. After the nuclear disaster, electricity consumption in the country was drastically reduced together with the population. We also believe that we can succeed in this because it is enough to refine results step by step. Even just a single additional parameter, for example taking into account the well-determined gender pay gap, impressively improves the correction quotient. Stage 1 of the index development recorded: 1. Test sample Central Europe
10 professions from completely different sectors and currently different social and economic hierarchies. 2. The same 10 jobs globally in different cultures and economies. 3. 10 jobs in one division. Similar social and economic hierarchies: middle management healthcare. 4. Expansion to 500 professions and "pairing" / "clustering" of professions to the 500 chosen. 5. Evaluation of the ratings on job platforms (e.g. Upwork) of 5×100 people in the same job.
Digital service such as web programmers, nurses, gardeners and managers in the auto industry.

Conclusion
Historically, evolution was in the hands of nature. Now it is suddenly largely in human hands, but we must be careful and use our scientific know-how as responsibly as possible. The task of today's young people, the "Transition Generation", will be to lead humanity through the coming time of chaos, danger and opportunity. In order for them to have a chance to be successful, the older ones have to leave space and resources. One of the forces that is working on a future that continues to be unedifying for most people is the so-called stakeholder capitalism, whose prophets are more likely to be assigned to the corporatocracy and where the signs currently predominate that they want to continue their plunder of the planet essentially undisturbed. By the way, we don't believe that there are particularly evil individuals at work here, not even the so-called ruling class, but rather that the system is currently designed in such a way that greed ruins everything in the end. But there is a much more inconspicuous broad emancipation movement with a gigantic sea of projects that work on the complete opposite. What these projects have in common is that they specifically address civil society solutions to the Great Challenges. When it comes to the topic of work, we include movements such as Transition Towns, D64, the common good economy, post-growth society, solidarity economy and Attac. There is also a growing public backlash against inhumane technology, which has already been identified by the World Economic Forum as a threat and hurdle to overcome. In paternalistic governance efforts for what is supposedly good for people, social engineering and social control are expanded. The “Great Reset” agenda, which has now officially been launched, seeks to guarantee protection from harm that is non-negotiable – in order to reduce concerns and suppress dissent. Basically, it's about building and maintaining the tolerance of the world's population. But if you look at the ongoing conflicts that are currently taking place on the streets – there are the yellow vests, Friday for Future, Blacklife Matters and the fairly opaque composition of various lateral thinkers – or let's say anti-corona protesters – in the German-speaking world, including the climax of the strangely symbolic civil war scenes in the US Capitol, then these are very dark pictures of an escalation of dissent and mistrust of governance with all its characteristics.
Disorientation and escalating protest as a toxic cocktail that of course carries great risks, but which can also shake people awake and make them aware of change. The most beautiful side effect of this “dystopia” is that we can now re-create, re-code life itself. "There's a new world out there and in that new world you can redefine every moment. You can be whoever you damn well want to be!"

We are living through the greatest experiment in human history when it comes to work, given the dramatic change brought about by a simple virus. The health and economic crisis, which we are desperately trying to overcome, is a very good time for change. At this moment, in which the "normal state", the usual processes of a society, are fundamentally disrupted, it becomes clear to what standards everyday life is usually based.
In his play “The Temporary Ones” shortly after the Second World War, Elias Canetti recreated how the relationship between the individual and society can be generally thought of. Of particular importance is the moment of a collective borderline experience, the experience of the dissolution of all social norms. It is this “lawless” experience that we also associate with work and how it will evolve.
NewPay. The momentum is there!
How this “state of emergency” should be assessed politically and culturally is something that even very clever minds differ on. Philosopher Giorgio Agamben, in the first lockdown, lamented the irrevocable loss of our last autonomous spaces for thought and action and the totalitarian triumph of state power. Jean-Luc Nancy and Roberto Esposito contradicted him and explained the lack of alternatives to the concrete measures and at the same time called for a critical examination of the mechanisms of globalization, neoliberalism and biopolitical forms of government. Slavoj Žizek went one better in the debate and saw the real philosophical revolution of events in the fact that the virus could strip away the entire scope of capitalist madness and, on a global level, realign the relationship between people and communities from an existential perspective.
Ultimately, all interpretation is pointless; what comes has to be shaped. Generation Y has the Herculean task to do this and “increased self-attention” is a term that gives hope here.
On the one hand, there is risk aversion, narrow-mindedness, rules, perfectionism and the search for security in teams and peer groups as an expression of the need for stability in the ongoing crisis, a kind of "plush commoning" is paving the way. On the other hand, this generation has an almost religious desire for self-realization, self-economy, multi-optionalism and rejection of traditional Puritan work virtues. Seen positively, it is a new way of being with oneself, a presence that characterizes this generation. You're looking for a sense of belonging, a purpose, perhaps a little meaning. These characteristics are not unimportant when it comes to emancipating New Work.

____
The social think tank New Work-New Culture has been dealing with work matters for 40 years.
In the spirit of Victor J. Papanek – “The green imperative: ecology and ethics in design and architecture” – NANK sees huge potential in the redesign of work and production and seeks and finds answers to the “Great Challenges” with Transition Design.
In recent years, NANK has tried to create positive images for "navigating uncertainty" with various exhibition formats at Ars Electronica and the Vienna Biennale, among other things, and thus raise awareness of solutions to the work dilemma.
NANK Co:llaboratory is a social think tank that researches the 'change of work'
NANK Co:llaboratory conveys the work philosophy concept of 'New Work'
NANK Co:llaboratory develops social design tools around work
Project collaborators: Elodie Bioux, Lisa Kärcher, Frithjof Bergmann, Felix Zabel, Thomas Schneider

GeldØWert



Tjark reads his deportation notice and can't believe it. He has been working unregistered for a temporary employment agency for a few months now and keeps himself afloat by providing support services in various care facilities. Mirko his boss was happy with him. He earned 370 euros this week. It looked so good! Now it says he has to go back to Afghanistan. His flight costs the state about twice as much.
Hanno the Uber driver is sleeping in his car. He's just doing this so he doesn't get fired. Because if he doesn't respond immediately to his algorithm-controlled service app, there will be trouble with the boss. So he has set an alarm that lets him start up reliably every time the city and the company think they can use his driving talent again.
Selma Ennaifer, the Tunisian Foreign Minister, speaks to representatives of the European Commission in an almost pleading tone. The reason? The EU's travel restrictions due to the pandemic mean that 70 percent (!) of the businesses in Tunisia, a tourist destination, have to close.
Three very different stories and yet similarly symbolic of the misery we are in. The examples have the theme of work and failure in common. In particular, it becomes clear which serious systemic errors are built into the current globally oriented work organization.

The gray perm of my hometown Linz, the family, and the school triggered a freedom gene in me early on. Initially relatively pampered and brought up in a middle-class environment, in addition to my studies, I was able to sip the fruits of our work system as an envelope inserter for a textile company, in the post office packing hall, in the Telekom call center and finally during community service in a retirement home. Even though it was relatively well paid, I thought to myself, “Well, brack!”. Work in the wage system appears to be one crippling oppressive attack. The lack of freedom didn't change fundamentally later in television as an editor and editor. Instead of getting a taste of truth, creativity and fame, the wrong people at the controls – namely politically acceptable news peddlers – spoil the actually great opportunities in a moving image medium. Since life isn't a jump-and-run game where you have 3 lives, I realized I had to get out of there. So, somewhat naively, I started my own personal liberation movement and set off towards film and art. I had to reorganize the lifelong issues of education, training and work for myself, which firstly wasn't that easy and secondly led to the realization: self-employment also has bars, just in plush ones. Not least because of this, I have been spending a lot of time since then, in addition to paid work, also initiating projects that deal with finding out how we as a society could escape from being held hostage by the job system. And that's exactly what this article is about.
Utopia for Realists
How do we change that with work? With digitalization, workplaces cease to be fixed places and begin to transform into states. I want to get you to think about these conditions together with New Work-New Culture. We could spend 15 minutes philosophizing, dreaming, pondering how we can ensure that we achieve something better in the rapidly accelerating transformation process of work.
A key to this is Bergmann's concept of “really, really wanting”. The New Work “WWW” has little or nothing to do with self-realization and self-optimization. According to Bergmann, New Work is not about a little improvement, not about job crafting. New Work – New culture doesn't just touch the surface and esotericism is a horror for us. NANK is an evolutionary, philosophical concept of freedom with a focus on work.

Work goes deep into the understanding of personality and the values and core beliefs associated with it. It also comprehensively defines and dominates relationship values in the world. New Work, as Frithjof Bergmann sees it, has nothing to do with love bombing, shining in the sun or the value of being used in itself. It is much more about the intrinsic motivation of what is present within oneself and how strongly it is perceived. In comparison to the power of external influences, people's own desires do not pull with strong ropes, but hang on a thin and easily torn, delicate thread. New Work calls this phenomenon the “poverty of desire”. The human being itself is far too often, first and foremost, weak and fragile. People quickly become discouraged, depressed and tame. Therefore, it is easy to intimidate or even train people, and many people are shy and withdrawn. Frithjof Bergmann also calls the phenomenon self-ignorance; beyond the individual, he speaks of the “concept of unlived life,” which often shapes working society. Handle
In the first part of this article I would like to outline Bergmann's New Work in more detail and embed it in the current socio-political context. It will be an attempt to position the essential elements, calling and community production, within the changing economic framework. The second part is about what role digitalization plays in the transformation process of work, what is going wrong and how we could transfer this into a new, more humane era. I refer to the current developments surrounding COVID and the long-term major forces of democratization, automation, globalization and monetary control. In the last part, I present our current approach to how a technological tool could be used to specifically improve the situation on the labor market. "Ø – The value of an hour of work" attempts to develop a value system for work secured using DLT (Blockchain) technology. Ø is an index that uses artificial intelligence to learn how to correct incorrect dispositions and unequal evaluations of work and systemic errors in salary issues. From data already collected, supplemented with new evaluation approaches, a factor is calculated by which an existing remuneration should be multiplied in order to better reflect the social value of a job. So that as little ideology as possible sets the tone, we try to record the activities themselves with a matrix of skill sets.
Both soft factors such as creativity and empathy as well as hard criteria such as the level of education required for this activity or the average work speed required are taken into account.

work is the change machine
In the part-time review that we call work, we slowly come to the realization that we as a society are somehow stuck when it comes to work. Economic growth madness, automation. Digitalization. It doesn't go forward or back. According to Bergmann, New Work has been thinking about why this is and how we could change it for 40 years and is proposing something new.
New Work-New Culture firmly believes that with smart changes to the work system we can have a positive impact on the whole world. Calling – the intrinsic calling – linked to collaborative production methods will revolutionize working life and the way we live. Technologically, the unbelievable is already possible. As a private person, you can dock your phone to the AI "GPT-3" and have a universe of possibilities that goes beyond your imagination and initially flattens you in its abundance.
For example, you can have fictitious conversations with Thunberg, Chomsky, Musk, Obama, the Pope or the Chinese civil rights activist Wei Jingsheng. For example, if you ask what is going wrong with digitalization and what the next right step would be, artificial intelligence provides the answer from the data of the published statements of these thinkers that it is up to us whether it turns out badly or well. But there are also amazingly more useful, logical and authentic-sounding answers to the really pressing questions of our time. Even scientists who work on it are left with a feeling somewhere between euphoria and bewilderment when they propose solutions to the climate problem. In some cases, these experts can no longer even understand exactly how AI comes up with its solutions when it invents new things in goods logistics, resource conservation and smart health robotics.
Theoretically, everyone with the Internet has swarm intelligence in their pocket as a tool for making decisions. Theoretically, firstly, access is limited and secondly, this oracle is the machine learning substrate of “everyone’s opinion”. The question is not just philosophical, but quite practical, whether this really has anything to do with intelligence. This supposedly collectively secured data is available from the perspective of a programmer and an institution that decides on the data composition of the model. To what extent this data is ethically compromised, to what extent it is just mainstream, to what extent it is the devil is currently being researched. What we already know is that they are similar to Wikipedia, white, male and dominated by rich countries.
New Work, with its approach of listening individually to what you need and what you want, helps you navigate uncertainty. When it comes to entering this vast, white and uncharted field of new possibilities, we need a strong inner compass. Because, despite the revolutionary framework, there may still be a marathon ahead of us before we synchronize sufficiently and develop common cultural techniques that raise the potential of what is possible and ultimately enable a better life for many. But what we are already dealing with is an acceleration of transformation processes, which people are sometimes facing with fear.
There has always been change, especially at work. But now we see the beginning of a new era. On the one hand, it is the obvious acceleration of upheavals that provides good reasons to speak of a new era. But it is also the nature of the fragility. As Václav Havel once said, it is as if something were exhausting and destroying itself. But what now rises from the rubble? How can we deal with these breaks?
New Work – New Culture is interested in the symptoms of decay and departure and the contradictions as an expression of a deeper transformation of work as we know it. When it comes to work and meaning, we still long for something different. It is not yet possible to define this other. But the fog is clearing. A first idea of what the new thing could look like grows as the offspring of a kind of collective longing. What we are seeing now is that a new form of being present and being present is emerging. This presence not only has something to do with digital 5G acceleration, but also something to do with authenticity, with being close to what you do every day.

Industrial Age – Information Age – Augmented Age
From the very beginning – and that was back in the 70s – the New Work did not want to regret the end of the job system, but rather to celebrate it frenetically. As Hegelians, we believe that we are not born free from the beginning, but that the path to freedom is difficult to achieve. And the job system has made people terribly unfree. In the classic wage-earning society, optimizing a company means optimizing “human resources”. People with individual wishes, skills and living conditions are referred to as resources and we want to use them as willing employees as multi-flexibly and effectively as possible. More and more people, and not just since Corona, are no longer playing along. People fall out of their roles, things are no longer in their place. Politicians have looked at continuities for too long and overlooked the radical epochal break around 1980. The topics have changed. An entire intellectual coordinate system has shifted: people torn between the individual and society, oscillating between the individual psyche and that of the masses. The individual's body is hidden into the social body. There is also a pull from desire to need, from a vertical to a horizontal order. In this situation, New Work calls for a sustainable strengthening of the individual's free will and a collaborative spirit. Finding out what you want, finding your calling, can help defuse problems when navigating uncertainty if we allow a little more flamboyance for what is “naturally possible”. During the industrial era, the vast majority of work was done using muscle power; it was dull, grueling, exhausting backbreaking work. In the post-industrial age, this work is almost entirely done by machines. The first “Dark Factories” are in Taipei. The production halls there remain dark because in normal operation only robots with sensors and not a single person work. Regardless of the current flight restrictions, Lufthansa has plans in place to manage business in the future with 40,000 fewer employees. It is estimated that artificial intelligence and augmented reality will make 30-50 percent of current jobs obsolete in the next 10 years. What will we work on? What will we work on? We don't know for sure. But what we can say is that the work will not stop. In order to overcome the "Great Challenges" – poverty, environment, health – in society, billions of people can and must get involved.
If we let machines do the dull work, two thirds of all work could be employment that makes you stronger, that is tailored to you, that advances you, that serves your self-realization. This represents enormous progress, because in the past only small privileged elites – artists, intellectuals and inventors – could enjoy the hearty lifeblood of such work. A cleverly linked network of collaboration, combined with entrepreneurship and fair remuneration mechanisms, can offer protection against job loss, downward mobility and poverty. The core message: 'Work on what you really, really want!' This important nucleus of freedom joins research and discovery in 'Community Production' and combines work on hi-tech machines with a good touch of entrepreneurial spirit.

The Value of Work
The way in which the current economic reference system has systemically anchored the exchange of goods for the last 150 years has weakened people. They have merely tamed it and not developed it. In addition, this modern, Western materialism only works slowly. Japan has not produced significant economic growth for decades, although perversely the ongoing costs of the nuclear catastrophe in Fukushima and the protests over it are counted as 'growth'.
The current understanding of economics is very narrow. Areas such as social care, family and reproductive work are systematically undervalued, and art and culture and the realities of life of marginalized groups are negated. Not least because of this, work is increasingly confronted with an inclusion logic of meaning, intimacy, concern and inclination. Mass production is not focused on creating cultural richness, diversity and inclusion. After 20 years of optimization efficiency, the richness has been consistently slowed down. If society wants to move away from mass production because other needs come to the fore, then we must necessarily ask ourselves: is the organization of work and production that we have the best possible way to unleash creativity and innovation?

money and work
In view of the change in the value and the meaning of the concept of goods itself, New Work is convinced that the value of work can also be completely reassessed. Up to now, money has been more of a lubricant for many things to fail in the end. A real store of value for work could be the lubricant that makes it all work. In order to regain more mining rights to life, we could empower people with a new form of work organization and work evaluation. We could experience a rise instead of an exhaustion of people with the digital and we could move more and more towards a culture of freedom. We just haven't really learned yet how to remelt and reshape our centuries-old collective patterns of thinking, speaking and institutionalization to fit the new realities. In this space of possibilities, in Walter Benjamin's “now time”, New Work-New Culture has arguments, images, terms and tools, where it seems so difficult to develop an emancipatory vision of the future and to look for ways to realize it in the here and now.
The Epic Conversation About the US Dollar System with Macro Analyst Luke Gromen from April 2020
One of the most important macroeconomic questions facing the world is the future of the global reserve system, which has been dominated by the US dollar for the last 80 years.
The topics in conversation:
Bretton Woods and why the world went for a USD-based system and not John Maynard Keynes' idea of a non-sovereign "Bancor" world reserve currency.
The transition to petrodollars in the 1970s.
The financialization of commodities that began in the 1980s.
The monetary policy vacuum after the end of the Cold War.
How a Shift in Executive Compensation Rules Led to Many of Today's Problems with Wall Street.
The export of treasury bonds as a business model.
The economic impact of 2008 worldwide and domestically.
The end of the purchase of Treasury bonds in 2014.
Why the Federal Reserve is the only sugar daddy left.


Scenes of the Crime
Digitalization is one of the big drivers of change in work. But the digital revolution is going wrong. We seem to be losing to the algorithms. Everything is regulated, used and accounted for and what is humane is crushed between the bits and bytes. Inequality continues to rise. The distribution of knowledge and resources as well as the value chains are distributed even more inhomogeneously globally, nationally and locally due to digitalization and the associated automation and production changes.
Change in production is at the same time a change in the value of labor. Work performance and its value have become largely decoupled from fair pay in real stores of value. Given the effects of digitalization, the value creation regime is currently changing. The practices of production and consumption are changing towards open, distributed and feedback forms of production. New forms of collaboration are becoming more relevant and decentralization and fair value exchange are taking shape.
Here too, the magnifying glass of the corona and economic crisis highlights the extent of the distortion and ruthlessly exposes weak points. Where digitalization, communication and synchronization succeed, work works. Mobile office and homeschooling are not an option for precarious professional groups. The 21st century digital economy runs on a 20th century operating system. The big tech companies like Tencent, Facebook, Google, Alibaba, Tesla, Netflix are single-handedly hijacking NASDAQ & Co. during Corona. The platform's feudalism à la Amazon is becoming obvious in its frightening power potential.
we must see the digital as a new form of craft
Instead of this monopoly and surveillance capitalism, New Work strives for an economic circular system of global neighborhoods with balanced production and use: decentralized, regional collaboration in the form of 'community production' as a kind of basic economy; concrete substrates of freedom in the form of access to digital and analog infrastructure and commons for people instead of a basic income. Community workshops for this purpose are being set up around the world and are astonishing with their production capacities. The 'Grande Garage' in the Linz tobacco factory is around 4,000 square meters and is equipped with, among other things, high-performance fabricators, laser cutters, computer-controlled milling machines and industrial robots. Researchers, industry and start-ups, but also students, artists and grandfathers are allowed to work, design and make prototypes there.


Leaving the Value of Work to Computers?
Digital systems, especially artificial intelligence, are at the beginning of their development history and valid results from technology assessments are only slowly arriving. What has emerged is that there are many ethical questions that need to be negotiated and require democratic consensus, which the legislature then has to take into account. The issue of security and control is also a substantial one. Both regulatory trends and completely free, bottom-up initiatives are emerging here.
The success of relationships must serve as an ethical basis for digital possibilities
New Work according to Bergmann, it is important that constitutional and relationship values are the benchmark for the use of technology. The success of relationships is currently being undermined by economics. Alternative work and remuneration models therefore urgently need to be developed. “New Pay” is currently more likely to be reduced to the renewal of compensation models within an organization. But we need a new approach to interdisciplinary compensation. What we are proposing is just a correction factor to the so-called "free labor market" so that the acceptance of such re-evaluated work performance among the traditional stakeholders in wage issues – the business people and trade unions – increases.
Ø – An AI- and Blockchain-Supported Index for the Value of Work
The index Ø attempts to reduce misallocations in existing calculation approaches for wages by taking correction parameters into account. Here is a rough overview:
The index learns from:
– Median income
– Anonymized tax data
– Market forces – Labor force – Unemployment BALI – Database
– Education-related employment career monitoring
– collective agreements
– Salary information in advertisements on global job markets
– Modern wage negotiation systems of trade unions and business associations / data 1960 and 2020
– Inflation, productivity, working climate index (AK)
– Job profiles and their task definition/skill sets.
– economic relevance models – GDP data, SDI – Sustainable Development Indicators
Index corrected:
– according to a points scheme based on empirical research results on job satisfaction
– according to surveys and new surveys on the system relevance of professions
– Relevant research data on labor markets – Public welfare balance criteria
– Environmental policy goals
– Social policy goals
– democratic semi-annual surveys
– New Pay for ecosystem services – Value from our own test group with "New Jobs" (Tabakfabrik Linz)
In the future, the index should also take soft facts such as happiness, trust, fear, stress, long-term presence, etc. into account. What we are currently working particularly hard on is, on the one hand, distilling the large amount of existing index data into work and integrating it into the correction in a properly weighted manner. On the other hand, the index tool should ultimately remain simple despite the variety of influencing factors that have to be taken into account.
A display that works something like the app with information about electricity consumption in Japan in 2011 would be ideal. After the nuclear disaster, electricity consumption in the country was drastically reduced together with the population.
We also believe that we can succeed in this because it is enough to refine results step by step. Even just a single additional parameter, for example taking into account the well-determined gender pay gap, impressively improves the correction quotient.

Conclusion
Historically, evolution was in the hands of nature. Now it is suddenly largely in human hands, but we must be careful and use our scientific know-how as responsibly as possible. The task of today's young people, the "Transition Generation", will be to lead humanity through the coming time of chaos, danger and opportunity. In order for them to have a chance of being successful, the older ones have to leave space and resources.
One of the forces that is working on a future that continues to be unedifying for most people is the so-called stakeholder capitalism, whose prophets are more likely to be assigned to the corporatocracy and where the signs currently predominate that they want to continue their plunder of the planet essentially undisturbed. By the way, we don't believe that there are particularly evil individuals at work here, not even the so-called ruling class, but rather that the system is currently designed in such a way that greed ruins everything in the end.
But there is a much more inconspicuous broad emancipation movement with a gigantic sea of projects that work on the complete opposite. What these projects have in common is that they specifically address civil society solutions to the Great Challenges. When it comes to the topic of work, we include movements such as Transition Towns, P2P Foundation, D64, the Common Good Economy, Post-Growth Society, Solidarity Economy and Attac.
There is also a growing public backlash against inhumane technology, which has already been identified by the World Economic Forum as a threat and hurdle to overcome. In paternalistic governance efforts for what is supposedly good for people, social engineering and social control are expanded. The “Great Reset” agenda, which has now officially been launched, seeks to guarantee protection from harm that is non-negotiable – in order to reduce concerns and suppress dissent. Basically, it's about building and maintaining the tolerance of the world's population.
But if you look at the ongoing conflicts that are currently taking place on the streets – there are the yellow vests, Friday for Future, Blacklife Matters and the fairly opaque composition of various lateral thinkers in the German-speaking world, including the climax of the strangely symbolic civil war scenes in the US Capitol – then these are very dark images of an escalation of dissent and distrust of governance with all its characteristics. Disorientation and escalating protest as a toxic cocktail that of course carries great risks, but which can also shake people awake and make them aware of change.

Given the dramatic change brought about by a simple virus, we are also living through the greatest experiment in human history when it comes to work. The health and economic crisis, which we are desperately trying to overcome, is a very good time for change. At this moment, in which the "normal state", the usual processes of a society, are fundamentally disrupted, it becomes clear to what standards everyday life is usually based. In his play “The Temporary Ones” shortly after the Second World War, Elias Canetti recreated how the relationship between the individual and society can be generally thought of. Of particular importance is the moment of a collective borderline experience, the experience of the dissolution of all social norms. It is this “lawless” experience that we also associate with work and how it will evolve. NewPay. The momentum is there! How this “state of emergency” should be assessed politically and culturally is something that even very clever minds differ on. Philosopher Giorgio Agamben, in the first lockdown, lamented the irrevocable loss of our last autonomous spaces for thought and action and the totalitarian triumph of state power. Jean-Luc Nancy and Roberto Esposito contradicted him and explained the lack of alternatives to the concrete measures and at the same time called for a critical examination of the mechanisms of globalization, neoliberalism and bio-political forms of government. Slavoj Žizek went one better in the debate and saw the real philosophical revolution of events in the fact that the virus could strip away the entire scope of capitalist madness and, on a global level, realign the relationship between people and communities from an existential perspective. "There's a new world out there and in that new world you can redefine every moment. You can be whoever you damn well want to be!"
Ultimately, all interpretation is pointless; what comes has to be shaped. Generations Y and Z have the Herculean task to do this and “increased self-attention” is a term that gives hope here. On the one hand, there is risk aversion, narrow-mindedness, rules, perfectionism and the search for security in teams and peer groups as an expression of the need for stability in a constant crisis; A kind of “plush commoning” is emerging. On the other hand, this generation has an almost religious desire for self-realization, self-economy, multi-optionalism and rejection of traditional Puritan work virtues. Seen positively, it is a new 'being with yourself', a presence that characterizes this generation.
You're looking for a sense of belonging, a purpose, perhaps a little meaning. These characteristics are not unimportant when it comes to emancipating New Work. The most beautiful side thing of all “Dystopia” is that we can now re-create, re-code life itself.

Article by Ilja Weisz – igor@servus.at
We trust in work
New Work New Culture
____
The social think tank New Work-New Culture has been dealing with work matters for 40 years.
In the spirit of Victor J. Papanek – “The green imperative: ecology and ethics in design and architecture” – NANK sees huge potential in the redesign of work and production and seeks and finds answers to the “Great Challenges” with Transition Design.
In recent years, NANK has tried to create positive images for "navigating uncertainty" with various exhibition formats at Ars Electronica and the Vienna Biennale, among other things, and thus raise awareness of solutions to the work dilemma.
NANK Co:llaboratory is a social think tank that researches the 'change of work'
NANK Co:llaboratory conveys the work philosophy concept of 'New Work'
NANK Co:llaboratory develops social design tools around work
Project collaborators: Elodie Bioux, Lisa Kärcher, Frithjof Bergmann, Felix Zabel

Community Production


We stand at the threshold of an epochal change in the history of work. The changes now emerging will be as incisive as the leap into the Industrial Revolution 200 years ago. One important question will be how we use the possibilities of new technologies for the labor market. Directly connected with the labor market of the future is the production of the future. It is a hybrid of bits and bites. And it will be made by all of us. The tools we gave out of our hands in the course of industrialization are tools we want to reclaim. With advanced technology we aim at forms of communal self-production. Workshops with high-tech DIY machines can be the factories of the future. Production capacity in these community workshops is already impressive and advanced in part today. The Grand Garage in the Tabakfabrik Linz is equipped, among other things, with fabricators, laser cutters, computer-controlled milling machines, and robots. During the industrial age, most work was done with muscle power; it was dull, grinding, exhausting physical labor. In the post-industrial age, this work will be done almost entirely by machines. Two thirds of all work can then be work that makes one stronger, is attuned to oneself, advances one, and serves self-realization. That represents enormous progress, because in the past only small privileged elites – artists, intellectuals, and inventors – could enjoy the hearty elixir of such work. This can now change.Community Formation

NANK wants to create free space for ideas and action that are not yet on the market. The priority is bringing people and cultural techniques together with suitable technologies. Neighborhood centers with autonomous, regional production in small spaces make it possible for everyone, for example, to breed fish themselves or simply make everyday objects themselves and thereby shape part of their own work. The chance to invest two thirds of one’s own work deliberately in one’s own development may make possible what neither democracy nor education nor prosperity has achieved: we, the people – and this includes the 85 percent who until now had to row the galleys – will finally have the chance to mature into fully developed human beings. Computers are used at home to burn DVDs, make books, furniture, and spare parts oneself. But this is only the beginning. Technological possibilities are emerging for making a large share of the things we need ourselves – in one’s own workshop, at home, or, even more economically and sustainably, in a kind of community center. The role of producer, distributor, and consumer is thus fundamentally changing. To escape more easily from the stranglehold of the decaying job system, we need a completely new economy. The backbone of this new economy consists in our moving incessantly, step by step, toward an economic form in which we make our own products and thereby gain resilience. It is not only about producing tomatoes or jam intelligently. It is also about producing our own tools, our own infrastructure, our own capacity to act.Community Production is green like lucky clover
Community Formation in an alternative economy

In classical wage-labor society, optimizing a company means optimizing “human resources”, as the phrase so nicely goes. What is meant are human beings and willing employees. New Work after Bergmann counters this efficiency mania with a sustainable strengthening of the individual’s free will and a collaborative spirit on equal footing. Working with one another, with the vigorous aid of empowering technology, becomes an exploration and discovery. The core statement is: “Work on what you really, really want!”
This important nucleus of freedom joins craft in “Community Production” and links work on high-tech DIY machines with a proper dose of entrepreneurial spirit. Finding out what one wants, finding one’s “calling”, can help defuse problems in the labor market. Allowing a little more flamboyance for what is uniquely one’s own to make, and a cleverly linked network of collaboration in connection with entrepreneurship and fair remuneration mechanisms, can offer protection against job loss, decline, and poverty.
Gespräch zwischen Mark Linsenmayer und Frithjof Begmann zu Community Production ( in englischer Sprache)
Mark Linsenmayer and Frithjof Bergmann discuss, on December 10, 2013, an important component of New Work: community production, also known as high-tech self-providing. Instead of acquiring all goods by buying them with wage money, you make them yourself by using advanced technologies that can be used, or soon will be usable, in community centers.
Community Production is a form of local economy in which people produce goods themselves by means of adequate production technology. In particular, fabricators and automated machines that are easy to handle, powerful, and multifunctional make it possible to provide for oneself: “We could develop a series of devices, apparatuses, materials, machines, and methods of production that would enable us, or a not very large group of people, to make 60 to 80 percent of what we need to live ourselves.” (The Era of New Work, interview with Frithjof Bergmann, Focus, No. 24/1999, p. 140).

The application of production technology for an economy based on self-provisioning makes “individual production” possible: “In place of gigantic production halls with many robots come more versatile individual robots that allow individual production. They make chairs and tables according to our designs and ideas, sew clothes, or cut car parts.” (The Era of New Work, interview with Frithjof Bergmann, Focus, No. 24/1999, p. 140). Individual production means that every person makes what they need for themselves. Production and consumption are therefore determined by the human being. This distinguishes Community Production both from traditional self-provisioning and from the prevailing economy with its industrial mass production. Traditional self-provisioning is “naturally” limited in scope. It has to orient itself to what can be wrested from nature. Ultimately it is nature that determines what and how much can be produced and consumed. In this respect, traditional self-provisioning always also means a relatively modest material standard of living. Community Production does not know this kind of self-sufficiency. Rather, it is the individual need of the respective person that determines production, meaning it serves to satisfy individual needs. Community Production guarantees production independent of natural production factors. What can be produced does not depend on nature, but on technology. Thanks to technological development, Community Production makes possible a self-provisioning that is incomparably more versatile and demanding than traditional self-provisioning:Local Economy
• Fabricators and networked computer-machine systems make it possible to produce everyday objects such as clothing, shoes, dishes, household appliances, and furniture, as well as non-everyday things such as jewelry and works of art.
• “Food houses” and procedures such as permaculture make food production possible in the city. People can thereby provide themselves with food in a simple and, above all, inexpensive way.
• New methods of building will make house construction possible for far more people than is currently the case. At present, owning one’s own four walls has become so expensive that fewer and fewer can afford it; whoever does afford it takes on a decades-long financial burden that becomes a millstone around the neck for many. Housing, which is a basic human need, should be affordable for everyone. This will be achieved when one can build simply and on one’s own responsibility.
The use of “high tech” implies that Community Production is not a return to nature and therefore not a return to heavy physical labor or muscle power. Rather, Community Production uses the most modern, advanced technology in such a way that the main burden of work is not borne by human beings but by machines. In contrast to traditional self-provisioning, Community Production is not laborious, exhausting, and draining, but creative, shaping, stimulating, and self-determined. It is not human labor power that is demanded, but the human mind that makes use of technology. While self-provisioning in earlier times had to manage without much technology, or, by its own self-understanding, did not make technology as much its own as it could have, Community Production positively relies on it. One can put it this way: what labor power is for classical self-provisioning, technology is for Community Production. This leads to another distinction: while traditional self-provisioning was time-consuming and left little time for other things, Community Production wants precisely to limit the time needed to produce what is necessary. An example to illustrate this is the automatic washing machine. While washing in earlier times was laborious drudgery that often took several days, especially in winter, washing today has become such child’s play that it is hardly perceived as effort anymore. The washing machine has largely taken over the work of washing and freed us from it. It is therefore simply impossible to imagine everyday life without it – even the greatest enemy of technology has one in the basement and no longer wants to do without it. The automatic washing machine shows what matters in technology: namely to ease necessary work for us in a practical, useful, effective, and efficient way, and where possible to take it away from us.
The use of “high tech” implies that Community Production is not a return to nature and therefore not a return to heavy physical labor or muscle power. Rather, Community Production uses the most modern, advanced technology in such a way that the main burden of work is not borne by human beings but by machines. In contrast to traditional self-provisioning, Community Production is not laborious, exhausting, and draining, but creative, shaping, stimulating, and self-determined. It is not human labor power that is demanded, but the human mind that makes use of technology. While self-provisioning in earlier times had to manage without much technology, or, by its own self-understanding, did not make technology as much its own as it could have, Community Production positively relies on it. One can put it this way: what labor power is for classical self-provisioning, technology is for Community Production. This leads to another distinction: while traditional self-provisioning was time-consuming and left little time for other things, Community Production wants precisely to limit the time needed to produce what is necessary. An example to illustrate this is the automatic washing machine. While washing in earlier times was laborious drudgery that often took several days, especially in winter, washing today has become such child’s play that it is hardly perceived as effort anymore. The washing machine has largely taken over the work of washing and freed us from it. It is therefore simply impossible to imagine everyday life without it – even the greatest enemy of technology has one in the basement and no longer wants to do without it. The automatic washing machine shows what matters in technology: namely to ease necessary work for us in a practical, useful, effective, and efficient way, and where possible to take it away from us.High Tech

Community Production and the prevailing economic system differ fundamentally and in every respect:The Difference
• Like every form of self-provisioning, Community Production brings about the unity of production and consumption; our economic system, by contrast, separates precisely these two areas, which makes mediation through markets necessary. In such a market economy no one is autarkic; everyone depends on everyone else and especially on the market. Community Production aims at the economic autonomy of the individual. That means dependency on markets is abolished, and with it their dominance and the constraints they impose on us.
• The currently prevailing economic form is a private economy, whereas Community Production represents a “public economy”. In it, the means of production are public or quasi-public goods in corresponding facilities. Only then is it guaranteed that they are accessible to all people and that their use is affordable for everyone. In the private economy, by contrast, the means of production are privately owned. This makes the mass of people who are propertyless in this sense doubly dependent: first, they depend on what is produced for consumption. They themselves cannot decide what is produced and what is not. Second, their work depends on production, which is why one speaks of “dependent employees”. Without production there is no work; without employers there are no employees.
• It goes without saying that work differs essentially in the two economic forms. In the private economy, people work for a third party: for the employer, for the market, for production, for money, and so on. Community Production, by contrast, means working for oneself.
• Community Production takes place in self-provisioning centers that, unlike our present companies or factories, are small. This is partly because these centers do not produce masses, but individual production; and partly because the production technology required for this is multifunctional, so only a few machines are needed.
• Market economy inevitably brings competition with it: just as companies compete with one another for market share, people compete for jobs. The globalization of the economy intensifies this competition, to whose constraints people have to submit. This competition disappears in Community Production, because each person produces their own material basic provision – and in doing so does not stand in competition with others.
• Our current economic system is growth-oriented or growth-driven and therefore boundless. Community Production not only abolishes the separation of production and consumption, it also limits them. While our economy wants to produce the largest possible quantities, “individual production” is oriented toward small quantities, thereby preventing excesses. Self-provisioning knows no overproduction, no bubbles, and no resulting financial and economic crises of the kind that currently shake our economic system.
• Mass production and mass consumption place a considerable burden on the environment; every ecological improvement of a product is neutralized by the increase in production demanded by economic growth; the globalization of the economy wants to spread the Western material lifestyle across the earth, which far exceeds its carrying capacity. Community Production, by contrast, is characterized by limitations of many different kinds that benefit the environment: it replaces industrial mass production with individual production; mass consumption gives way to individual need fulfillment; economic growth is a foreign word for Community Production. It is not the absurdly artificially inflated material lifestyle of the West, not its consumer frenzy, that is carried into the world, but a basic provision that can be individually shaped. Since Community Production is local economy, it decisively reduces the immense global transport of goods, which contributes substantially to environmental pollution. At the same time, it abolishes the now prevailing separation of life and work that spread with the economic and job system. This reduces the disastrous mass commuting to and from work worldwide, which also means less environmental pollution. Apart from that, thousands upon thousands of traffic jams are avoided in which we senselessly waste our time and nerves.
• Community Production starts from individually limited needs; consequently, production and consumption are limited as well. In contrast, the prevailing economic system propagates limitless needs, to be met by constantly increasing production and consumption. The only thing that dampens or limits mass production and mass consumption is money. It is the money available to us that decides what we can buy and therefore consume. Without money we could not satisfy our needs or pay homage to consumption, which would immediately affect production. What is decisive, therefore, is that producers and consumers have sufficient money, or access to additional money in the form of credit; then, monetarily speaking, nothing stands in the way of increasing production and consumption. Incidentally, self-provisioning is cheaper than buying goods. It is often claimed that mass production is cheaper than individual production. But that is a “myth”: a large part of the price of a product often consists not of production costs, but of other costs such as transport, advertising, packaging, storage, distribution structure, intermediaries, and overhead costs of all kinds. All of these disappear in self-production. Self-production is also advantageous where production costs are high. Anyone who has ever bought a house knows how expensive it is. But whoever can build their house in an effective and efficient way – and that is precisely the concern of Community Production – will massively reduce the costs of home ownership. In any case, the cost reduction, or the value one creates through one’s own work, will amount to more than an average earner could earn in money through employment in the same time. At the same time, the self-provider saves many incidental costs, of which the outrageously high broker fees are the most annoying and unnecessary. Community Production is an economic approach that can be applied worldwide, especially since it has solutions ready for problems to which conventional economics has no answer: Community Production can counteract the global rural exodus, since such a self-provisioning center can be implemented in every village; it can make basic provision possible in the growing slums of the world, where regular jobs are scarce; and Community Production can give work to the masses who, in view of global population growth, stream onto the labor market and find no jobs there. Suppose Community Production were to prevail and the world’s population could be materially provided for by it sufficiently; suppose individually definable self-provisioning could be achieved with limited effort: the economy would no longer be an end in itself, but a means to an end. Concretely: its function would be to create the necessary condition for “free work”.
• While the prevailing economic system depends entirely on money, Community Production decisively reduces this dependency: the more people provide for themselves, the fewer goods they have to buy; the less money the individual needs in order to make a living. In place of earning and spending money comes self-production. For the sake of contrast, Frithjof Bergmann therefore calls the economy of “New Work” an “economy of minimal buying” as opposed to the prevailing economy, which he characterizes as an “economy of maximal buying” (Frithjof Bergmann, New Work-New Culture, Arbor Verlag, 2004, p. 316).

Since Frithjof Bergmann’s death more than four years ago, things have grown quiet around “New Work”, his concept for a comprehensive redesign of the work system. All the louder, however, have become those who simply appropriated the term and continue to bend it to their own purposes. First among them is the mainstream of New Work, which does refer to Bergmann but has something entirely different in mind, so that there are no longer any points of contact between the original and the mainstream.
Frithjof Bergmann repeatedly emphasized that New Work is a many-sided and comprehensive approach that cannot be pressed into a definition or – which amounts to the same thing – reduced to one dimension. New Work is, among other things: a critique of the prevailing work system (job system) and its many deficiencies. It makes clear how burdensome the conditions have become under which people have to work. The formulation of a new work system in order to overcome the irreversible abuses of the job system.
In doing so, New Work introduces new forms of work on both sides of the labor market and beyond it, in order to reduce dependence on the job system as far as possible and to significantly improve the quality of work. A critique of the prevailing economic system. It demonstrates that this system is not sustainable. In particular, infinite economic growth in a finite world is a contradiction that creates more and more conflicts. A contribution to post-growth economics. For New Work shows how we can free ourselves from the compulsion toward economic growth. Sustainable economic activity. The concept stands for good and healthy work, for local production that is climate-friendly and conserves resources, and the modern self-provisioning envisioned in the concept is a remedy against the mentality of consumption and disposability.
The question of technology: What role should technology play in our society in the future? Who should have access to it? And how can it be used for the benefit of society as a whole?
Both a concept for the societal level and a guide for individuals. The individual can begin to shape their work in the spirit of New Work without having to wait for labor-market reforms from above. NWNC is a flexible concept that each person can adapt to their own possibilities and needs. It is a concept applicable worldwide, one that does justice to the globalization of work and the economy.
The formulation of the claim to usher in a new culture in which the economy and work should serve human beings and their development. In Bergmann’s words: “The goal of New Work is not to free people from work, but to transform work in such a way that it brings forth free, self-determined, human beings. We should not serve work; work should serve us. The work we do should not consume all our strength and exhaust us. Instead, it should give us more strength and energy. It should support us in our development, helping us become more alive, more complete, stronger human beings.” (Frithjof Bergmann and Stella Friedland, Neue Arbeit kompakt, Arbor Verlag, Freiamt 2007, p. 16)
With this article series we want to recall the original concept and its many layers by devoting each contribution to one aspect of New Work. We do not claim completeness; rather, further texts will be added over time. The authors are guides, companions, members of the network of the same name, and people who engage with Bergmann’s world of thought and his concerns. Bergmann later renamed his concept “New Work-New Culture”, among other reasons to distinguish it from the emerging mainstream. In this article series we consistently speak of “New Work” in order to point out that the term originally goes back to him and not to abandon it to the mainstream.
New Work as a New Work System
New Work as a new work system should not simply be imagined as an optimized version of the existing job system. The abuses described in the first contribution are not merely temporary negative side effects; they are deeply anchored in the job system. It must therefore be changed fundamentally, by having the job lose its dominant role and be supplemented by additional forms of work. New Work takes concrete form in three central forms of work:
I Reduction of Working Time
New Work provides for employed people to reduce their working time – concretely: to transform the full-time job into a part-time job. This measure is based on two essential arguments:
- Reduction of the negative effects of the abuses: while sport, yoga, or mindfulness training merely alleviate symptoms, the reduction of working time addresses the root. Those who work less relieve themselves permanently and protect themselves against burnout, exhaustion, and chronic stress. Beyond that, part-time work opens new possibilities: people can reconcile work and private life better, continue their education, or take more care of themselves and their relatives. Part-time work helps people cope healthily with the steadily lengthening working life. Those who do not exhaust themselves remain productive over the long term – part-time work is therefore sustainable and future-oriented.
- Free space for new activities: only through the reduction of job work does time emerge to pursue other activities in the sense of New Work. The loss of job time is compensated by productive, self-determined work.
II Self-Provisioning Through Technology
Self-provisioning means making things oneself instead of buying them. This makes us more independent of the compulsion to earn money and therefore of job work. New Work now links self-provisioning with the most advanced technology – with computers, 3-D printers, new production methods and processes, and the internet. The result is that in the future we will be able to produce a large share of the goods we need in everyday life quickly and easily ourselves. Take, for example, the latest development of chatbots such as ChatGPT or Copilot: one can create application letters oneself, improve texts, have drafts prepared, and much more. For pupils it becomes a self-learning tool that partly makes teachers and tutoring unnecessary. This new self-provisioning does not imply a return to nature or heavy physical labor. Rather, it makes technology serve us in such a way that the main burden is not borne by human beings but by machines. What one’s own labor power was for classical self-provisioning, technology is for modern self-provisioning.
Why is this form of work necessary? Through digitalization, technologization receives an enormous push. More and more jobs disappear through automation, while fewer new ones are created. For employees this means: they lose income when machines take over their work. Employers, by contrast, benefit because they can produce more cheaply and achieve higher profits. The consequence: income differences grow, the gap between rich and poor deepens, and social inequality increases.
This process must not be left to itself. It must be shaped and used – as a challenge and an opportunity. Bergmann puts it succinctly: “The new technologies are coming toward us like a great wave: if we do not move from the spot, it can bury us; but if we move with skill, this wave could lift us higher than ever before.” (Politische Ökologie, oekom Verlag, Munich, May/June 1998 issue, p. 55).
Technology can therefore not only destroy work, but also create new forms of work. Used correctly, it enables society to shape its material basis of life itself and to emancipate itself from the dominant economic system. This vision is realized in the concept of High-Tech Self-Providing (HTSP).
The prosumer as modern self-provider. In technological development, the potential for self-provisioning in the form of HTSP is already visible: we all know the trend toward the prosumer – a mixture of producer and consumer. What characterizes the prosumer is that they participate in producing the goods and services they themselves consume. In this way they become a modern self-provider.
There are, however, two forms of the prosumer that must be strictly distinguished:
- Company-controlled outsourcing: companies shift tasks onto consumers, who take them over with the help of technology. Examples include online banking, self-checkout in supermarkets, or software updates. Here the human being works unpaid for the company in order to reduce its costs.
- Self-determined production (the core of New Work): far more relevant and decisive for New Work is the second form: people use technology to produce things for their own needs independently of the market. One example is decentralized energy supply. Those who install a photovoltaic system produce electricity for their own consumption and feed the rest into the grid. This corresponds to the principle of subsistence economy: self-production with a market surplus. In the past it was food; today it is energy or digital knowledge. Only this second form leads to genuine emancipation from the job system.
Conclusion: in view of technological development, it is crucial that people use technology to free themselves from the job and economic system. Part-time jobs and HTSP create the necessary free spaces for the highest form of work in the sense of New Work: calling.
III Calling
Although New Work represents an alternative work system with several forms of work, none has attracted as much attention as calling. It has virtually become the trademark of New Work: “The expression most associated with New Work is the repeated, recurring question about the work someone really, really wants to do.” (Frithjof Bergmann, Neue Arbeit, Neue Kultur, Arbor Verlag, Freiamt, 2004).
We must continuously secure our material basis of life. We do this by earning money through a job. Philosophy describes this compulsion as “necessity” – in contrast to “freedom”, in which we may devote ourselves to higher activities. From this follows: the job remains bound to necessity, while calling detaches itself from it. Calling is “free work”, while the job represents “necessary work”.
Calling as the opposite of the job
- A job means working for others (employer, market). Calling means working for oneself and one’s own development.
- The job is a means to an end (earning money). Calling is an activity that carries its purpose within itself.
- In the job we do what we must; one always has a “master” over oneself. In calling we pursue what we really want; one is one’s own master.
- Those who job become replaceable cogs in the machine (means to an end). Those who follow their vocation are ends in themselves and want to make something of themselves.
- The job is subject to economic logic (it must pay off). Calling withdraws from this logic; it is judged by how it serves the human being.
- A job can drain and dehumanize. Calling, by contrast, enlivens and lets us grow beyond ourselves.
Calling and identification. Work that one “really, really wants to do” is work with which one identifies. Identification creates identity – it gives us reliable knowledge of who we are. In a pure performance society, in which work is only a measurable instrument, this possibility of identification disappears. With calling, Bergmann wants to create a new source of identity.
Identification does not arise through mere reflection, but through encounter with the world. One must “go out”, as Goethe said, in order to find oneself in doing. In calling we express our uniqueness. While in the job we are replaceable by machines as functionaries, our individual handwriting is irreplaceable in calling.
Calling and freedom. According to Bergmann, freedom is a function of identity. An action is free when the human being identifies with that from which the action proceeds. When will and doing are in harmony, the feeling of freedom arises. Calling increases the degree of human freedom in three ways:
- It creates harmony and coherence.
- It promotes the development of the individual personality.
- It frees from necessity and compulsion and makes self-determined work possible.
Keywords: New Work, work system, reduction of working time, part-time work, burnout prevention, sustainability, self-provisioning, technology, High-Tech Self-Providing, HTSP, digitalization, automation, social inequality, Frithjof Bergmann, prosumer, self-determined production, subsistence economy, decentralized energy supply, emancipation, calling, self-determination, necessity vs. freedom, identification, identity, self-expression, individuality, meaning in life, free work.
Since Frithjof Bergmann’s death more than four years ago, things have grown quiet around “New Work”, his concept for a comprehensive redesign of the work system. All the louder, however, have become those who simply appropriated the term and continue to bend it to their own purposes. First among them is the mainstream of New Work, which does refer to Bergmann but has something entirely different in mind, so that there are no longer any points of contact between the original and the mainstream.
Frithjof Bergmann repeatedly emphasized that New Work is a many-sided and comprehensive approach that cannot be pressed into a definition or – which amounts to the same thing – reduced to one dimension. New Work is, among other things: a critique of the prevailing work system (job system) and its many deficiencies. It makes clear how burdensome the conditions have become under which people have to work. The formulation of a new work system in order to overcome the irreversible abuses of the job system.
In doing so, New Work introduces new forms of work on both sides of the labor market and beyond it, in order to reduce dependence on the job system as far as possible and to significantly improve the quality of work. A critique of the prevailing economic system. It demonstrates that this system is not sustainable. In particular, infinite economic growth in a finite world is a contradiction that creates more and more conflicts. A contribution to post-growth economics. For New Work shows how we can free ourselves from the compulsion toward economic growth. Sustainable economic activity. The concept stands for good and healthy work, for local production that is climate-friendly and conserves resources, and the modern self-provisioning envisioned in the concept is a remedy against the mentality of consumption and disposability.
The question of technology: What role should technology play in our society in the future? Who should have access to it? And how can it be used for the benefit of society as a whole?
Both a concept for the societal level and a guide for individuals. The individual can begin to shape their work in the spirit of New Work without having to wait for labor-market reforms from above. NWNC is a flexible concept that each person can adapt to their own possibilities and needs. It is a concept applicable worldwide, one that does justice to the globalization of work and the economy.
The formulation of the claim to usher in a new culture in which the economy and work should serve human beings and their development. In Bergmann’s words: “The goal of New Work is not to free people from work, but to transform work in such a way that it brings forth free, self-determined, human beings. We should not serve work; work should serve us. The work we do should not consume all our strength and exhaust us. Instead, it should give us more strength and energy. It should support us in our development, helping us become more alive, more complete, stronger human beings.” (Frithjof Bergmann and Stella Friedland, Neue Arbeit kompakt, Arbor Verlag, Freiamt 2007, p. 16)
With this article series we want to recall the original concept and its many layers by devoting each contribution to one aspect of New Work. We do not claim completeness; rather, further texts will be added over time. The authors are guides, companions, members of the network of the same name, and people who engage with Bergmann’s world of thought and his concerns. Bergmann later renamed his concept “New Work-New Culture”, among other reasons to distinguish it from the emerging mainstream. In this article series we consistently speak of “New Work” in order to point out that the term originally goes back to him and not to abandon it to the mainstream.
New Work as a Critique of the Work System
New Work is first of all a detailed critique of the prevailing work system. If there were nothing to object to in it, thinking about alternatives would seem unnecessary. But precisely the opposite is the case. 1
Deficiencies and Abuses in the Prevailing Work System
The work system (also called the job system or wage-labor system) only emerged with industrialization and brought abuses with it from the very beginning. These changed over time: old ones disappeared, new ones appeared, working conditions improved or worsened (and the situation differs from country to country). What remains decisive, however, is this: the deficiencies and abuses continue; only their appearance changes. Critique must therefore be renewed regularly. Which adversities currently make working life in Germany especially difficult for people and have a negative effect on them?
Performance Pressure
Performance is defined as the relation of work to time – and this relation is optimized in the sense that more work has to be done per unit of time than before. If this is the case, two things happen: first, the performance aspect of work moves more and more into the foreground. This means, on the one hand, that work is transformed into performance and the work society into a performance society. And, on the other hand, we come under performance pressure the more performance we have to deliver. This idea of performance is omnipresent in the world of work and can in principle affect all employees.
Time Pressure
Time pressure arises as a consequence of increased performance, because one has less and less time per topic, per matter, per project, per customer, and so on, and therefore comes under pressure to nevertheless finish on time and deliver the expected results.
Pressure to Succeed
Success has developed into the central category in working life. Success is the altar to which people sacrifice and on which they are sacrificed. One problem with success, however, is that it does not satisfy; it makes people hungry – hungry for more success. Goals, plan figures, targets, and expectations are ratcheted upward. This leads to pressure to succeed – and to powerlessness, because success depends not only on one’s own effort but also on external factors over which one has no influence.
Overwork
Overtime is a constant phenomenon in the German world of work. According to the Federal Statistical Office, 1.3 billion hours of overtime were worked in 2023.2 It is another means of using human labor power optimally, but at the same time also of exhausting it.
Meaningless Jobs
These are jobs that nobody really needs and that produce no added value or social benefit. They are jobs whose holders themselves know that they are engaged in meaningless employment. For that reason these jobs also have no meaning for them. People keep the job because it earns them money and because they see no alternative. These jobs can be found in all sectors. The scholar and activist David Graeber called them bullshit jobs. Drastic, but correct. These jobs suggest that they are useful, valuable work, which in reality is not the case at all. Their disappearance would not be noticed. 3
Joblessness
Joblessness is a constant companion in the job system. Even now: despite a favorable labor-market situation, we have more than two million job seekers. The next recession or wave of automation will certainly come, and then there will be even more.
Precarious Employment
These are poorly paid jobs that are easy to terminate and often fixed-term. They also include agency work and temporary work as well as marginal employment.
Precarious employment also includes those seemingly secure full-time jobs that are threatened by joblessness – whether through the globalization of work, the rationalization of work, or the restructuring of work, which often leads to staff reductions and outsourcing.
Understaffing
More and more sectors suffer from acute staff shortages (almost every truck driving in front of you says: “colleague wanted”). The reasons are, as always, manifold, but they are rooted in a dysfunctional job system. The vacancies exist even though there are also job seekers who cannot find a job. This mismatch problem shows that the labor market does not fulfill its most basic task: bringing supply and demand together. Part of the problem is homemade: for many years, experienced employees were sent into early retirement by the tens of thousands – and they are missing now.
Be that as it may: understaffing leads to a greater workload for employees, because the existing work is distributed over fewer shoulders, which causes stress, so employees then become ill or leave, which in turn places an even greater burden on those who remain.
The Job Dominates Life
We do nothing more in our lives than work: eight hours a day, forty hours a week. But that is not all. The job reaches deep into the rest of our lives:
Overtime accumulates and extends the working day.
The daily trips to work and back cost time and money. This commuting is increasing overall: from one city to another; from the countryside to the city; from east to west.
Then we must add the time required for qualification and further-training measures.
Those who finally finish work not seldom take work home with them – whether literally or figuratively.
One consequence of this is that other contents of life cannot be integrated alongside the job, or cannot be integrated adequately. Conflicts arise in reconciling work and life.
Job Work Is a Means and Not an End
At its core, job work means exchanging labor power for payment. It is therefore essentially a means – for the employee, a means of earning money in order to secure a livelihood. With job work, the human being remains bound to the necessity of securing their material basis of life. In this respect, job work is necessary work and not free work. For the employer, in turn, it is a means of achieving the organization’s goals with human labor power.
Effects of the Abuses
These and other abuses have a negative effect on people. The extent to which job work now harms people can be measured by the following developments:
Dissatisfaction with the job is increasing. According to surveys, the “number of employees without emotional attachment in Germany is at its highest level since 2012”. According to the Gallup survey, it is almost 20 percent.4
The list of work-related impairments is getting longer and longer: states of exhaustion and fatigue, lack of energy and dejection, nervousness and headaches are among them, to name only a few.
Illnesses such as back problems and high blood pressure are spreading and are on the way to becoming widespread diseases.
Regarding the increase in mental illnesses, the health-insurance statistics are unambiguous.
For this abundance of abuses and their grave effects on human beings, Bergmann coined the term “pathology of the wage-labor system”. 5
How do these abuses arise? There are several explanatory approaches. Let us take joblessness as an example.
Joblessness is closely connected with the current work system. Historically, before the job system there was subsistence economy, in which self-provisioning dominated. For the self-provisioning society, joblessness was an unknown concept. The self-provider was dependent neither on a labor market nor on an employer; no one could dismiss them, because they were self-sufficient. By contrast, we officially and literally call the job holder a “dependent employee”. That means whether a person keeps their workplace or not, whether they find one or not, is fundamentally not up to them. Let us therefore state clearly: joblessness or unemployment is a symptom of the current work system.
Our work system (the labor market) functions like a bottleneck. It lets only job work pass through. Formulated as a contrast: work as such is unlimited, while jobs are limited, especially secure and well-paid ones. We have therefore not only made ourselves dependent on the job system; we must constantly make efforts to preserve and create jobs in order to counteract job scarcity – or, as it is often so nicely put: we must prevent or combat joblessness.
Now the job system is coming under pressure: declining economic growth, increasing international competition, and refugee movements are already troubling it. Yet nothing is as threatening to the employment system as the technologization of work, which receives an enormous push through “digitalization”. It makes it possible to systematically replace human labor power with technological labor power. Consequently, far more jobs will be automated than newly created. Frithjof Bergmann recognized this danger early, as did many before and after him. Representative here is the study by Frey and Osborne: “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?”6 But beyond this, Bergmann saw like no one else that technological development is Janus-faced – it contains enormous dangers, but also opportunities: “The new technologies are coming toward us like a great wave: if we do not move from the spot, it can bury us; but if we move with skill, this wave could lift us higher than ever before.”7 Bergmann warns against leaving technological development to itself or to its current beneficiaries. Society must think about and decide which technology we want and, above all, how it can be placed in the service of all people. For this reason, technology plays an extraordinarily important role in the concept of “New Work” – see the article “New Work as a New Work System”.
A principal explanation for the existence of many deficiencies and abuses follows from the fact that work is a means for producing goods and services. In business administration, work counts as a production factor. It is therefore subjected to production conditions and organized according to economic criteria such as efficiency, productivity, and effectiveness. The economization of work is a constant process and currently takes place under headings such as flexibilization of work, agile work, flat hierarchies, management by objectives, teamwork, and so on. What is decisive is this: work is oriented toward the needs of the organization or employer and not toward the individual needs of the human being. The deficiencies and abuses that result are deficiencies and abuses for the working person, not for the organization. For example, the employee must meet increasing performance demands; if this becomes noticeable for them as performance pressure and then affects their health, they become stressed and ill, but not the organization.
Conclusion
We have established a work system that human beings are expected to serve and that burdens them increasingly. Why do people put up with this? Why do they not rebel? One important reason is that they are dependent on the job system. The job secures income, livelihood, material security, acquisition of pension entitlements, health insurance, unemployment insurance, social status, and so on. The other decisive reason is that they have no alternative. New Work has therefore made it its task to be this alternative.
1 In his book “New Work-New Culture”, Bergmann devotes an entire chapter to this critique: The Wage-Labor System (pp. 79 to 120).
2 https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2024-05/arbeitszeit-ueberstunden-beschaeftigte-milliarden-stunden-deutschland
3 David Graeber, Bullshit Jobs: A Theory, Simon & Schuster, 2018.
4 https://www.gallup.com/de/472028/bericht-zum-engagement-index-deutschland-2023.aspx
5 See Bergmann, p. 83f.
6 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271523899_The_Future_of_Employment_How_Susceptible_Are_Jobs_to_Computerisation
7 Politische Ökologie, Oekom Verlag, Munich, May/June 1998 issue, p. 55.
Keywords:
New Work, Frithjof Bergmann, work system, job system, wage labor, work culture, critique of work, Neue Arbeit, post-growth economics, sustainable economic activity, performance pressure, joblessness, bullshit jobs, technologization, digitalization, self-provisioning, modern working world, work-life balance, job satisfaction, meaningful work
Die 10 ersten Schritte


Reformation or revolution. Throwing everything that has existed so far overboard would be an understandable but probably exaggerated reaction, and therefore belongs among the less intelligent proposals for what now needs to be done. Nevertheless, the power and dominance of capitalist economic activity also need a strong and powerful response. One assumption of New Work New Culture is that the response could lie in withdrawal. More and more people are not only mentally saying goodbye to this way of living; they are putting on gloves in order to roll up their sleeves somewhere completely different. We need indignation and a Solidarność 2.0 that simply gets to work where politics looks away.
“We as the building people of the coming world”
New Work-New Culture is so groundbreaking and also means such comprehensive change in everything that one could spend a lifetime dealing with it. Not even Professor Frithjof Bergmann had the time and leisure to grasp every aspect of the new epoch of work into which we are entering. Precisely for that reason it makes sense not to wait until everything around New Work appears clear, logical, and structured enough, but simply to begin with New Work New Culture.
Work Matters – Wage Labor, Calling, Self-Provisioning
Changing work can be approached quite pragmatically. NWC offers three basic approaches for this: redesigning existing wage labor, redefining one’s personal attitude, or quite concretely becoming a prosumer. It does not have to be an entirely new job; it does not have to be a leap into cold water, although for some people that might do them good after years of routine. The model of the three pillars makes it possible to find one’s emphasis between different forms of work and to shift between them as needed, ultimately finding one’s own personal style of work and life.
Step 1 – Thinking About a Personal Alternative
One can enter wage labor at a solid, financially strong company or at an experimental start-up. One can look for work at a company such as Semco SA in Brazil, in a system where management functions without managers – that is, in a revolutionary, self-referential leadership model – or place oneself in the hands of a charismatic and trustworthy leader. Some would rather found a company on their own or work as a one-person enterprise in a “third existence”, collaborating with changing teams from project to project. What may be decisive is that one takes what one really, really wants seriously and also applies it to the other forms of one’s working life. If one gains the possibility of responding with one’s working time and, for example, becoming more independent of monetary remuneration by making things oneself, spaces open up in which one can explore how to find, sustainably, for oneself, for one’s family, for the employer and for society, a stable, meaningful, and healthy work system close to happiness.

New Work-New Culture Principles
* Work as little time as possible for fiat money.
* Work as much as possible on what you really, really want and what fulfills you.
* Work as much time as necessary in communal self-provisioning.
Thinking Work from Life – Fields of Action
Examples:
– Health – The health of the individual is strongly linked to their willingness to perform and their potential abilities.
– The question of meaning – We are burning the violins. The social compatibility of one’s own work; looking at the common-good balance sheet for oneself.
– Money&Value – relations of domination. Freeing oneself from one’s own limitations and from those of others. How and where do we see our value?
– Performance – Individual talent is more important than the concept of performance. When one passes through today’s job centers and the rituals of the modern economy, the performance demand is excessively determined by others and fundamentally wrong in its claim to be good for society. The concept is used against life, against aliveness. Thinking work from life means here: if performance is to be a principle at all, then it would have to be self-determined performance. Performance must be an experience that motivates me because I notice that it is good for me, because it is exciting, alive, inspiring. In the present system, the diversity of the definition of performance is reduced, and with it the intelligence in the system. With the concept of performance we can once again develop strength, develop energy, create an ecosystem of talents. What do I nourish myself from? That is the central question one has to ask, and what can I do to take a courageous step?
Examples of Obstacles:
– Change often means fear and worry. In principle, this is all right. It lives in human beings as an important aid to orientation. But often it blocks us in completely illogical ways. That is why irrationality has to be reduced in processes of change. Change triggers emotions that are not necessarily rationally anchored and can therefore be difficult to justify. Often they are archaic patterns that well up from our self-understanding like demons. What are these demons, where do they come from, and how are they programmed into us? It is about reducing loss of control and learned helplessness.

(After Harald Welzer)Steps 2-10 for Thinking Work from Life
2. Finally trust your feeling that a grand theater of illusion is taking place around you. The scenery simulates stability, but the play is a farce: again and again fat men appear and shout “growth!”, speculators play country dominoes, and number girls keep dancing across the stage with images of catastrophe. The audience is annoyed and angry, yet remains seated until the end of the performance. But: when will that come?
3. Better leave the performance and begin asking very simple questions. For example: why do people have to work more and more when they are already working more and more? Why do debts grow larger when more and more is being saved? Why does everything else shrink when the economy grows?
4. Look for answers together with your friends. For example: because all the idiots are working more too. Because the savings wander into other people’s pockets. Because many listed companies form parallel societies remote from the state.
5. Decide from now on not to participate anymore if your answers trouble you.
6. Begin by stopping. Stop believing European politicians. Stop believing economic research institutes all the more. And, for God’s sake, stop allowing yourself to be told without objection that any decision was without alternative. There is no such thing in democracies.
7. If you have now reached the point where you no longer tolerate everything, use your room for action. You live in one of the richest countries on earth, perhaps you are even excellently educated, you enjoy life and think fairly well of yourself. Why the hell do you do the same thing every day and never anything different?

8. Your room for action? Simply look at what others are doing. There are incredibly good approaches and projects: energy cooperatives, neighborhood gardens, fair consumption, local currencies, great foundations, companies that refuse the compulsion to grow. Write more politically if you are a journalist. Research for a different future if you are in academia. Change the break-time topics if you work on the assembly line. Shop differently if you run a restaurant. Ask where the fish comes from when you go out to eat. Take an interest in the future of your pupils if you are a teacher. Merge with a kindergarten if you run a senior citizens’ home. Think of hellfire if you head one of the four large energy companies. Produce cradle to cradle if you own a factory. Risk something if you consider yourself intellectual.
9. Try to belong somewhere where you can proudly say: “We do this differently!” Find ideas more interesting than experience; do not live at the expense of others.
10. Form laboratories of the future and have fun doing it. Forget the “five minutes to midnight” chatter of the ecological movement and the talk of the “world community” and the necessity of global solutions. No one stood at your cradle and said in a hollow voice: “You have come to us to save the world!” It is completely enough if you begin to deal responsibly with your life, your loved ones, and your country. But please start right away ; ))

New Culture Campus


Where will tomorrow’s skilled people come from? Everyone who understands the world of New Work not merely as an experimental field, but as the reality of the future, must ask this question. The idea of the New Culture Campus describes an educational landscape that turns our understanding of school upside down. In the major and important debates about New Work, one significant aspect is sometimes pushed into the background: the question of how preparation for it can begin as early and as holistically as possible. Until now, the youngest generation has hardly been included in the social upheaval currently underway with regard to a different world of work. It is the adults who are facing the transformation. They strive for agile organizations, flat hierarchies, more responsibility for the individual, and lifelong learning. Yet the necessary skills, technological knowledge, awareness of sustainability, and capacity for open cooperation are not given to school and university graduates as basic equipment. The idea of New Work therefore has to begin earlier – namely in education and in the values with which the following generations are to grow up.Thinking school in entirely new dimensions

The Campus of Longing
The idea of the New Culture Campus, born from philosopher and founder of the New Work movement Frithjof Bergmann, is a radical departure from today’s idea of school. In such an educational landscape, the process leads from daycare through primary school to university and the first steps of one’s own entrepreneurial activity. Instead of teaching and learning, the children’s and young people’s own experiences are at the center. They engage with art, technology, craft, and IT; they experience nature directly and develop a practical understanding of sustainability. „In the current classical school system, children are functionalized into performers chasing the best grades,“ explains Margret Rasfeld, whom Frithjof Bergmann brought on board for implementing the New Culture Campus project. „When people think of school, everyone is so stuck in old patterns that a revolution in education seems unthinkable. Instead, we work away at small improvements to the old system. That is why it is an important approach to first bring an idea like the New Culture Campus into the world so that it can be discussed.“ Margret Rasfeld, current managing director of the initiative „Schule im Aufbruch,“ has already gained experience as a school principal in setting transformative processes in motion. But New Culture Campus thinks beyond all the limits imposed by German school and curriculum obligations. „Our New Culture Campus is still in the planning stage,“ explains Andy Mayer, friend and right hand of Frithjof Bergmann. „For the implementation of the project, we want to bundle the knowledge of several bright minds and use synergies from different directions.“ Another pioneer for the project is therefore Marcus Fink, managing director of the Kreisjugendring Münchner Land. He too criticizes the structures in which society and school move – faster, higher, further. He brings experience from extracurricular education and does not see the New Culture Campus as a distant utopia. „Since 2010, the Jugendbegegnungsstätte am Tower in Oberschleißheim has already been for youth work what the campus could become for education. A large site, workshops, proximity to nature, and technology. People interested in the idea can come to us and see how such a concept has already been implemented at least in parts. And if more and more people are convinced by the idea, realization can happen very quickly.“

The holistic education aimed for on the New Culture Campus equips learners with skills they will actually need in the world in which they will live. „Ninety-five percent of what children laboriously acquire in school today is forgotten,“ Margret Rasfeld makes clear. „We want to prepare them for a world of work that places the human being at the center, their potential, not the economy. With the new form of learning, they would have the chance to try things out and discover what suits them, what they burn for, what they want to carry into the world. They gain systems knowledge that opens up how everything is connected. And they learn meta-competencies, such as the ability to work in teams and the attitude that they are allowed to make mistakes.“ Marcus Fink adds: „It is no longer enough to memorize things in order to recall them in a world in which everything turns and changes every day.“ Transformation always begins with small steps. Similar approaches, though not with this degree of social radicality, have been pursued since 2017 by the learning center „Learnlife“ in Barcelona. Inspired by this approach, the campus „Life Hamburg“ is currently emerging. The project of mail-order heir Benjamin Otto aims to realize the vision of intergenerational learning. For financing New Culture Campus sites, Margret Rasfeld can imagine a fund founded and maintained by companies, from which municipalities build such educational landscapes without any company being able to exert direct influence. However, it is not only funders who must be convinced by the revolutionary educational orientation for the new generation. There are the parents, whose advance trust such a school needs; the lawmakers, on whose approval such a far-reaching design depends; and the teachers, who will face entirely new challenges. „Of course, teacher training also has to change,“ explains Margret Rasfeld. „But we must not delay this too long. By 2030 we must have changed the world. The future does not wait for administration.“ INFO/LINKS

[custom-facebook-feed]

Get in touch with us!


There are various ways to get in touch with New Work New Culture. It depends on your interest in New Work:
Do you want an overview of what is happening right now? Then the Facebook group is the easiest way to make contact.
Or do you want to know when members of the NANK community can be heard speaking about Frithjof Bergmann? We publish the important dates here on the website.
Is it about direct contact with the press spokesperson? Then contact Andy Mayer.
Is it about content on New Work New Culture, the Bergmann archive, or exhibitions? Then Thomas Schneider and Harald Gründl are the right contacts. Depending on what you want to know, we have listed experts in New Work-New Culture on this page with their different focuses, whom you can contact with specific questions.
____
Texts on New Work after Bergmann
Nina McDonagh, Frithjof Bergmann , Günter Thoma, Thomas Staehelin, Thomas Schneider
General lecture / New Work New Culture
Günter Thoma, Thomas Staehelin, Franz Nahrada, Claus Seibt, Sebastian Becker, Thomas Schneider
____
Calling – what one really, really wants – the mentors
Christine Jung , Thomas Diener, Jörg Beger
OMA (Open Mentors Academy)
Since 2006, mentors have met annually in changing locations (Potsdam, Vienna, Osnabrück, Freiburg, Munich), working together on the connecting aspects of New Work-New Culture.
____
Community Production
Thomas Schneider lecture More punk, less hell, workshop, New Work socio-technology (generative production methods, AI, blockchain, cultural memes)
Blair Evans (Incite Focus Fablab),
Prof. Andy Gebhardt (University of Aachen)
____
Education
Katrin Steglich, lecture, workshop,
Florence Holzner, Colearning Vienna, lecture, workshop
Sebastian Becker, lecture, workshop, link to a lecture recording
Günter Thoma, lecturer, speaker
____
Social enterprises
Tom Zuljevic (Die Querdenker, Caritas, Pro Mente)
Gerd Neuner (Neue Arbeit Neue Kultur Kiel)
Walter Häcker (Genossenschaft Arbeit Zuerst) – sadly died in August 2020
____
Entrepreneurship
Prof. Günter Faltin, Thomas Schneider
____
Environment, mobility, housing, living, working
____
Exhibitions / Social Design

Places and regions with contacts
USA
NWNC | Ann Arbor, Frithjof Bergmann
NWNC | Detroit, Richard Feldmann/James & Grace Lee Boggs Center, Blair Evans/Incite Focus Fablab
NWNC | Madison, Mark Linsenmayer/The partially examined Life
CANADA
NWNC | Toronto, Ruth Spitzer/dorkenwald&spitzer
SOUTH AFRICA
NWNC | Johannesburg, Lerato Tahane
INDIA
NWNC | Mumbai, Anil Saldanha/Radical Ecological Democracy
GERMANY
NANK | Kiel, Gerd Neuner/Neue-Arbeit-Neue-Kultur-Verein Kiel
NANK | Stuttgart, Walter Häcker/Arbeit Zuerst Genossenschaft
NANK | Berlin, Thomas Staehelin /+ZONE KG, Frauke Hehl/Workstation, Babette Scurell/Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau (originally Neue Arbeit Dessau eV.), Prof. Günter Faltin/Stiftung Entrepreneurship, Freie Universität Berlin
NANK | Neustrelitz, Katrin Steglich, Thomas Staehelin
NANK | Hannover, Christine Jung/Frei-Räume
NANK | Potsdam, Rosalind Honig/OMA Mentorenakademie
NANK | Hamburg, AK Lokale Ökonomie, Contraste magazine, networking alternative-economy projects across Germany
NANK | Wuppertal, Christine Nordmann/Bergische Region , Schnürsenkelfabrik-Startpunkt
NANK | Freiburg, Jörg Beger/Transition Town
NANK | Köln, Sozialistische Selbsthilfe Mühlheim
NANK | München, Sara Dorkenwald /dorkenwald&spitzer
AUSTRIA
NANK | Linz, Tabakfabrik/Koop Arbeit/Fair Markt – Tomislav Zuljevic, Thomas Schneider
NANK | Vienna Co:llaboratory/Thomas Schneider, Claus Seibt, global villages/Franz Nahrada, Florence Holzner/Colearning Wien/Markhof, Thomas Diener/FairWork
NANK | Vorchdorf, OTELO
NANK | Ottensheim, Elke Hinterndorfer/NANK OTELO
NANK | St. Leonhard, Tommy Zuljevic/Wohneinrichtung OASE
NANK | St. Veit, Martin Maitz/Institut für Zukunftskompetenzen
NANK | Schlierbach/SPES Zukunftsakademie
NANK | Innsbruck, Manfred Blachfellner/change the game
Further people and NANK locations in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland on a map


Groups on the web
Official NANK Facebook group with about 1,300 members
Collaboration and the innovations that organize it shape the lifestyle of an entire generation. In order to find forms of new cooperation, the framework in which the working world is ordered is increasingly changing. This is reflected not only in new spaces and the changing infrastructure of work in large companies, but also in the new cultural techniques of the diverse ventures of entrepreneurs, which are now growing strongly far beyond the urban context.
[fts_facebook type=page id=2372544694 access_token=EAAV1ZB2rTwggBADZAGyuxDNvvq9r9ZAfEsrcyud3ek20u0lskkdKI35S2QZArSKNygDYGkY9dZAZBTMZAXPtfo4JMxPaWonEQPsTlS536kJH6D91GBZB3YRSZBs8jmbfniEgfkqTtqVACNK3eaWfXDw8LCoG6ZAdCS0iFer7c0JxVb4DZCO8BbOCz4ixweMt4hfP0VXBKaV2iWJiKV4kAZCmROjNAZBZCFPF8vZAUps6uVZBFFIaqwZDZD posts=6 description=yes posts_displayed=page_only]

newwork-newculture.networks


The New Work-New Culture philosophy now blows through entire towns, regions, countries, and continents, and manifests itself in NANK centers, NANK associations, small enclaves, workshops, and a loosely connected global community. Over the years, NANK has initiated or co-organized many centers and project initiatives. The central question has always been how people can be strengthened through work and thus arrive in a new culture and in more freedom. Many people who have no opportunity to visit one of these nodes of New Work ask themselves: where can I concretely take something from?
NANK is a globally active social think tank, and the NANK community consists not only of places; many individual NANK people are active in associations or try to make a difference where they live, improving their work situation and livelihood in the spirit of Frithjof Bergmann. New Work includes topics such as sustainable mobility, high-tech DIY, gardening and farming, green professions, work organization, social enterprises, commons, and distributed ledger technology. Many companions of Frithjof Bergmann are engaged precisely in these fields.
Mottos such as „away from consumption“ and „pressure out, desire in“ give rise to many initiatives: artist collectives, food co-ops, urban-farming initiatives, exchange circles, and craft markets that work quietly in individual neighborhoods and rural communities. Bergmann’s ideas are implemented there in whole or in part, critically questioned, tested a great deal, and sometimes discarded again. In the best sense, NANK is an emancipatory movement that everyone can walk in their own way. Many young people experience „small“ again as very „beautiful,“ and also rediscover the connection of hand and head. Craft is experiencing a revival. Linked with mixed forms of social design, social sculptures around living and working, creative districts, building groups, and coworking, new societies are emerging everywhere. A new lifestyle with its own flair has been born. Being able to help shape one’s own working conditions is becoming increasingly important to many young people, and in doing so they are developing a very professional and responsible culture that is by no means apolitical.New forms of work for more freedom and resilience

Collaboration and the innovations that organize it shape the lifestyle of an entire generation. In order to find forms of new cooperation, the framework in which the working world is ordered is increasingly changing. This is reflected not only in new spaces and the changing infrastructure of work in large companies, but also in the new cultural techniques of the diverse ventures of entrepreneurs, which are now growing strongly far beyond the urban context. Below we have listed the projects, places, and people in which New Work-New Culture has participated and which currently (2020) invite people to join in.Locations, associations, people
USA NWNC | Ann Arbor, Frithjof Bergmann CANADA NWNC | Toronto, Ruth Spitzer/dorkenwald&spitzer SOUTH AFRICA NWNC | Johannesburg, Lerato Tahane INDIA NWNC | Mumbai, Anil Saldanha/Radical Ecological Democracy GERMANY NANK | Kiel, Gerd Neuner/Neue-Arbeit-Neue-Kultur-Verein Kiel AUSTRIA NANK | Linz, Tabakfabrik/Koop Arbeit/Fair Markt – Tomislav Zuljevic, Thomas Schneider Further people and NANK locations in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland on a map
NWNC | Detroit, Richard Feldmann/James & Grace Lee Boggs Center, Blair Evans/Incite Focus Fablab
NWNC | Madison, Mark Linsenmayer/The partially examined Life
NANK | Stuttgart, Walter Häcker/Arbeit Zuerst Genossenschaft
NANK | Berlin, Thomas Staehelin /+ZONE KG, Frauke Hehl/Workstation, Babette Scurell/Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau (originally Neue Arbeit Dessau eV.), Prof. Günter Faltin/Stiftung Entrepreneurship, Freie Universität Berlin
NANK | Neustrelitz, Katrin Steglich, Thomas Staehelin
NANK | Hannover, Christine Jung/Frei-Räume
NANK | Potsdam, Rosalind Honig/OMA Mentorenakademie
NANK | Hamburg, AK Lokale Ökonomie, Contraste magazine, networking alternative-economy projects across Germany
NANK | Wuppertal, Christine Nordmann/Bergische Region , Schnürsenkelfabrik-Startpunkt
NANK | Freiburg, Jörg Beger/Transition Town
NANK | Köln, Sozialistische Selbsthilfe Mühlheim
NANK | München, Sara Dorkenwald /dorkenwald&spitzer
NANK | Vienna Co:llaboratory/Thomas Schneider, Claus Seibt, global villages/Franz Nahrada, Florence Holzner/Colearning Wien/Markhof, Thomas Diener/FairWork
NANK | Vorchdorf, OTELO
NANK | Ottensheim, Elke Hinterndorfer/NANK OTELO
NANK | St. Leonhard, Tommy Zuljevic/Wohneinrichtung OASE
NANK | St. Veit, Martin Maitz/Institut für Zukunftskompetenzen
NANK | Schlierbach/SPES Zukunftsakademie
NANK | Innsbruck, Manfred Blachfellner/change the game


PARK – a prototype for New Work was an initiative with young Viennese architects in the summer of 2017. How can we use the predicted transformation in the world of work for new forms of working together and living together? In the summer of 2017, Team Vienna pursued this question with the temporary and participatory spatial installation PARK, transforming the parking lot at the edge of Vienna’s Naschmarkt into a public experiment. For four weeks, the wooden structure with its work infrastructures was open to all city residents for collaborative programming. The process concluded with the symposium New Work – New Social Housing. You can read the results of the experiment here.
Official NANK Facebook group with about 1,300 members Collaboration and the innovations that organize it shape the lifestyle of an entire generation. In order to find forms of new cooperation, the framework in which the working world is ordered is increasingly changing. This is reflected not only in new spaces and the changing infrastructure of work in large companies, but also in the new cultural techniques of the diverse ventures of entrepreneurs, which are now growing strongly far beyond the urban context. Below we have listed the projects, places, and people in which New Work New Culture has participated and which currently (2020) exist.Groups on the web
[custom-facebook-feed]






















































































































































































































